Tony Blair hails his multicultural Britain

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2054903/Tony-Blair-defends-opening-door-mass-migration.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

>Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.

>The former prime minister said it was 'right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

>Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain 'stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.

>His comments come just days after official figures revealed that the population is expected to soar by the equivalent of a city the size of Leeds every year for the next decade.

>A defiant Mr Blair insisted his party’s policy on immigration was the right one. He said: 'It’s been a very positive thing and there is no way for a country like Britain to succeed in the future unless it is open to people of different colours, faiths and cultures.’

Douglas Holmes was right when he wrote that when Tony Blair speaks he alienates the part of the population that does not accord with his world embracing vision. Tony Blair is a really evil bastard, not like his cowardly colleagues who whine about him in the new statesman behind his back, he is a real warrior of the faith. In Alastair Campbell's 'the Blair years', an autobiographical work reputed to be the book most left in hotel rooms, he claimed that Blair based his all his actions an legal morals on a sect of Christianity which believes in what we would recognise as a form of absolute humanism - That all humans are naturally good and therefore the same and that the only legitimate human was one with humanist values. It was Tony Blair who wept in the oval office telling Clinton that he was abandoning his christian moral duty by not invading Serbia, It was Tony Blair who would take a vicarish tone whenever he spoke to the public on any issue, right up the the Iraq war and the Last days he said it was a human rights mission of which he was deeply proud. any and all issues, that extreme form of moral superiority and self righteousness. He left office to work for the UN as peace envoy to the Middle east and has made himself incredibly wealth doing it, he has earned £15 million a year and built a great property empire.

I wonder what his opinion would be if he had to live on minimum wage of the council estates across Britain that have been made a hell on hearth because of his devastating policies. In The above speech Tony Blair who let in 3 million immigrants, confirms what we knew in this classic article - that alleged the labour Immigration policy was a deliberate attempt to create a client base of future dependants=voters. I have highlighted the above quites; what does 'success' 'stronger' 'succeed' mean? what is the economic value of having a society that is more tolerant and diverse? - He isn't talking about economics you dummies, he is talking about the fact that the reason this was needed is to remould the country into his vision of a modern nation. Yes, you were lied to, shock and horror.

Britain is a country that is supposed to be grateful for it's freedom. in programmes we mock 20th century totalitarian regimes for their state sponsored buildings and social programmes - Freedom therefore clearly means the freedom of a political class to impose its will though the clenched teeth of the masses, just as tolerance is a virtue in and of itself with no regard to the evil that is tolerated.

Tony Blair has said loud and clear to the world that he did this because he hates this country, and he hates it's people; he wants to make it progressive and a model of his fellow politicians the world over 'Look at what i have done, how I have destroyed a people and created the new humanity representing the new individualist here in Britain!'. That he is so open about it shows his utter contempt for public opinion. You would think with people like Blair who would need fascists like us - he has made himself a figure of hatred in his own third world safe seats.

But nobody cares. This story wasn't even front page news, it is already in the memory hole. People will moan about how their lives are getting worse, but they will still vote like they do. what is required is a moral shock - a reaction against this that has a profound affect on the people. How can it be that this traitorous piece of filth can insult us in this way after such an injury, and continue to go unpunished?

This news came out on the same day an illegal immigrant strangled a man to death in the hospital bed next to him. it is no secret that the immigrants hate him and us indistinguishably. To Them, Blair it a war criminal and a christian terrorist - with things the way they are I am not holding out he will last forever, it is just a case of whether they get to him first.

I am the 99%

>> I was forced to study a useless degree that did not have any real world application. This wasn’t a smart career move. The solution is for the government to reimburse me.

>> I am the 99%



>>I live in a world that doesn’t value fine arts degrees, it is worse than living in Nazi Germany. I should not be punished for trying to break the mould.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was fired from my job because I have issues with authority. My internet start up failed because I lack any business sense. None of this is my own fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am very angry that the government have nothing better to do than answer my emails during the worst economic crisis of recent times. I don't have problems and don’t need to work for a living as this takes up all my time.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am an attention whore. Look at my calligraphy. We are all in this thing together yeah?

>>I am the 99%




>>I am a lawyer, but I'm not very good as I can't get any clients who can actually afford to pay me.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was once rich but lost it all due to my own stupidity and greed. I am forced to be a rent boy because I can’t do menial work.

>>I am the 99%



>>This is a copy of my résumé. I don’t know why I don’t have a job.

>>I am the 99%



>>Woe is me. I took out a six digit loan for an education I did not bother to pass. I stayed out partying too long and collapsed from heat stroke. You should pay for this even though it was my own stupid fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I don’t have problems but I am going to college and I don’t know how that will earn me money.
It is my opinion that education should be free no matter what I choose to learn whether it might benefit society or not.

>>I am the 99%


>>I am solidly middle class, I have two masters degrees I don’t have to pay for. I was able to buy my own house and this is the reason I cannot afford to get pregnant. I need more money.

>>I am the 99%




>I made frivolous purchases without a care for tomorrow, I made no plans for my future, I knocked up a girl and now it’s all catching up with me; I want the government to take make all my problems go away.

>I am the 99%



>>I am a junkie whore, I want you to pay me for advanced education as it is my human right.

>> I am the 99%



>>I am a Trans... WHAAAAAAAAT?!
.. Are you fucking serious?



.. look, If you are not going to make the effort




If you are like me you have been paying with some dismissive attention to this 'occupy wall street' protest in New York, it is of course just co opted crap - totally fake garbage performance by the Education industry and its student minions. That is fake, but people - they are real, and they do interest me. One for the side effects of the protest has been a mass outpouring of emotion on the internet 'I am the 99%' which has been dubbed 'the human face of the protest'. To me it is a window into the soul of post industrial decay - these ugly people and their ugly opinions exposes all the fatal flaws in our corrupt moral system of ethics and values more than it exposes our financial mess.

This idea of human rights and entitlement: Everyone has to be equal, everyone has to have a life, everyone has to have a degree in media studies, everyone has to have a blackberry messenger and a flat in town, and become a pop star - none of them ever question the whys and the wherefores. They have been pumped full of expectations and that sense of entitlement that have been put there by liberalism - Put there to fill the hole left by the destruction of our national culture, family, rights, duties, ect. Our reward for winning the war – to take any amount of shit to replace it with the weakness and dependence on the things liberalism was supposed to bring everyone. Don’t kid yourself, they are an endemic part of the problem.

I don't pity these people at all, they are scum. I had a friend from school that epitomised their condition; His thing was he really wanted to be something; he wanted to be a comedian and film director or some shit, but as an individual he was too weak. The interesting thing happened: When it was clear he was beginning to fail, when the realities of life started catch up with him, when he really needed some courage - instead of accepting the reality of the situation and facing up to it (Which would have then ultimately involved making just a few small changes to his life) he just collapsed into nothing instead. He began to cry, claimed he had a mental disability, faked illnesses and addictions, formed a victim ideology(anarchy), sought out a victim culture(drugs) - and believing in it all 100%. The more things got worse the deeper and deeper into this delusional sense of entitlement. When the state refused to accept he had a medical condition of any kind, he continued to stay on the dole - all the while blaming everything but himself and finding any excuse to not face up to anything.

This is the condition of the leftist movement, it is an identity fetish based on victimhood: If the 20th century was the century of the self, then the early 21st century is the century of the victim. On display is the lowest form of degeneracy and egoism. These people might play themselves the world’s largest violin - but they are the cause of their own problems - As well as my friend, I can't help but making comparisons to the student G20 protest in London which is exactly the same; a protest for more of what we already have; That feeling when tuition fees triple in the space of a year and they scream - FREE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE ... To perpetuate the continued destruction by the junk capitalist system, the destruction of the city centres, massive government spending to create sub cultural zones. This temporising brainwashing communist shit has been instilled into the population by capital for the ultimate and continued benefit of capital - to keep people weak and stupid. All this protesting is an emotional charade, it is masturbation - it is a constant lie so it never has to admit its own failure. Even the actual demands of the protestors which include amnesty for illegal immigrants, bigger union powers, Equality legislation, open borders - policies like this are the reason for the declining standard of life and economic collapse. All the Government projects and easy credit that finance their exorbitant lifestyles are what have directly led to this financial meltdown. Think of these people as the last gasp of capitalism.

The way I see it is this - yes things are bad and they are going to get worse. The solution to the problem, like any other problem - is to be proactive and face up to the challenge - to strive and to struggle until victory or death, that is the fascist way!
Just standing around waving signs is embarrassing - it doesn't mean anything unless the people who wave those signs have the power to act. People posting pictures on the internet doesn't mean anything either unless those people are feared. Take responsibility, take control of own destiny, Through your actions you redeem yourself.

Rejected from art school
Not qualified for architecture school
Orphaned at 18
Homeless at 21
I slept on a park bench and dreamed of the world

I am the 99%

The goal of education is to destroy you

Liberals celebrate themselves endlessly for all the so called civil rights and progress they have given us, it is like being invited to your own funeral by your murderers so you can thank them in person. They really like to rub everyones noses in it with all these anniversary events, history months, monuments, television specials and so on. They act like it was the most significant thing that ever occurred and young people today are taught to idolise the struggle of the 60's-80's for the institutionalisation of the equality movement and prize its dead culture; its films, its music, literature, and so forth are embedded into both the media and the curriculum as the pinnacle of human development. the primary concern of these people is that when we move into modernity people will stop caring about their struggle and we could lapse into something horrible.

The reality is that the achievement of the civil rights movement has been to steadily erode and utterly destroy the the quality and meaning of human life. The entire history of the civil rights movement as a process has been the dismantling of the rights and privileges of the majority population under the guise of 'equality', the 'giving of rights to others' - If you have awarded a minority with the sacred and legal right to be equal in a given field without affecting them in any way - must necessitate a penalty on the majority group. the more minority groups and fields you add the more of the population is debased to the lowest common denominator.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043567/Schools-judged-gay-gipsy-pupils-progress.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8786641/Dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html

>Schools will be penalised if they fail to improve the progress of ‘vulnerable’ groups of pupils such as those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual. New Ofsted guidelines reveal that heads of primary and secondary schools must show their education ‘meets the needs of the range of pupils’ in their classrooms, including gipsy and traveller children.
>Schools could see their teaching being judged ‘inadequate’ if they do not reduce gaps in achievement between different groups who make up a significant proportion of their student population.
>Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in "the full range of flesh tones", reflecting the diversity of the human race
>The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two. According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them "unlearn".
>People who are feeling defensive can say 'well there’s nothing wrong with white paper’, but in reality there could be if you don’t see yourself reflected in the things around you,” she said.
>“People might criticise this as political correctness gone mad. But it is because of political correctness we have moved on enormously. If you think that we now take it for granted that our buildings and public highways are adapted so people in wheelchairs and with pushchairs can move around. Years ago if you were in a wheelchair, then tough luck. We have completely moved and we wouldn’t have done that without the equality movement.”

The Equality movement... let that sink in. Equality is a dishonest term in that it is a codeword for anti-life, so far as the word 'life' has meaning in the survival sense. To make children equal, you must rob the entire youth of the challenges and experiences that make life bearable, so all kids can be the same as the drooling retard. Some people cannot be raised up from the bottom, because their constitution is simply inferior - the egalitarian insistence that all people are equal and their culture equally valid results in a failure to acknowledge this possibility and prevents any treatment of the cause. If you really wanted to raise the standards of children from 'disadvantaged communities' you would address the core social issue which would be to take them out of these communities and re socialise them while they are young, - you also get rid of all the negative cultural influences that affect them; the television, their music, anything that carries their culture, you get rid of it and instill in them the superior values of the majority group. Because that is not an option and therefore raising the standards of these people is impossible - the solution will more often than not to destroy the standards of education to a mind numbing dross, and the HAVE to do this, it is legislated and teachers on the front line have to meet their equality targets. They will also face the similar problem of addressing the equality issues of an imagined group such as aforementioned transsexual children. I mean, what the actual fuck are you supposed to do with that? A significant part of promoting equality is 'educating' young in cultural marxism at the expense of endless time that could have been spent educating children about practical life skills.

Looking back on my own experience it was difficult even then to get anything done - I really made the effort to try and challenge myself with something that resembled a protestant ethic, even for the things that didn't count; behaving well, dressing and speaking properly, but absolutely nobody gave a shit, and I feel my attitude actually resulted in me being penalised by some of the trotskyite teachers who made assumptions about my background. All the wealth and class issues leftists bang on about has nothing to do with it, We didn't have any money, any text books, television, computers, none of that - but we still tried - but what is the point of trying today? liberals don't know what they are doing, they hope they are going to create a generations of left wing hedonists , they are totally wrong it is economically and socially unsustainable. From primary education to university it is prizes for all, half the adult population doing temporised debased degrees that are worthless in the real world, - their hope is by this point you are so indoctrinated into the systems way of thinking that you don't realise you have been conned out of an existence. That is what all the liberal self celebration is for, it is the great social lie that is marching us to social oblivion - and therefore the promise of starting again.

The more the system does this the more that people will realise they face a very real choice between Integralism=Life and communism=death. Already this hopelessly flawed system is robbing the population of its idealism. it has already left a generation of young people with a bitter superiority complex - those who were intelligent and knew they could have done well, but realise now that their future and history has been sold out after they were mislead by false heroes and role models to maintain the wrong aspirations. You have the great social problem of enforced nihilism - to make people equal has meant that we have lost our national culture - the very thing that used to make like bearable, that got people up in the morning; anything that gave people pride and a sense of responsibility has been robbed from millions of our people, leaving a very big hole - right went hey all need it the most in face of the lofty and unattainable standards promoted by liberalism. Desperate, Betrayed, weakened, fearful - It invites trouble for the future from those offering a cure to the current mess.

Yuri Bezmenov - how to subvert a society

KGB defector who changed his name to Tomas Schuman on how to demoralise a society. His work has been widely stolen from by far right commentators, (programmes like follow the white rabbit) and this is the origin of the termiology. As an adversary the extent of his work was not to introduce into america something alien but to promote existing tendencies and attitudes in society that are already destroying it. There is apparantly reason behind it; it is questionable why american security interests (Security being the only section that functions properly) invest so much in countering internet censorship in china and 'democracy movements' in the middle east.

The point is you have a direct correlation between the dominant political attitudes in the west - and exactly what someone would do if they wanted to actually destroy a nation.

Yuri says their goal is to undermine/break up the following.

Ideas:
Religion - politicise, commercialise - postmodernism: 'supermarket of faith'
Education - promote moral relativity and permissiveness
Media - monopolise it, make it irrelevant and narrative driven, create a myopia of uninformed opinion
Culture - False heroes and role models, consumerism, fads.

Structures:
Law and order - Is 'legislative' not moral
Social relations - Rights vs. obligations, replacement of community with bureaucracy, social workers ect.
Security - denigrate the image of Police, Military, intelligence as dangerous. glamorise/portray sympathetically; outlaws, criminals, the enemy, spies, etc.
Internal politics - politics/Political party non issues = antagonisms - divide society against itself.
Foreign relations - enemies as 'friends', stunts, world community.

Life:
Family - Break up, create dependency on welfare.
Health - sports as supplement, junk food, - enfeeble the masses
Race - Run ethnic conflict, promote entitlement of minority group/oppression complex
Population - Urbanise the population, 'urban culture' to alienate them from the historical national life
Labour - Unions vs society. Promote entitlement and victimisation

I think an important part of argument is having a consistant message. Here you have all of these individual things that relate to the wider issue of national survival. To oppose the processes that are aimed against you requires that you should expose the destructive tendency for what it is. Liberals will say things like 'racist' if they want to discredit you, because if you promote group identity exclusion is a possibility = RACISM! - you must make people understand it is the same of liberalism, that it is their destruction and that the choice in this world is between Communism and Fascism/ death and Life.

Ruling party conference

Relevant stories http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14985706
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2039821/We-let-rioters-Clegg-tell-party-looters-fell-cracks-years-ago.html

The Liberal Democrats are having a party conference where they intend to make very bold centrist statements. Nick clegg affirmed his party's commitment to Liberal social policies and moderate public spending! .. I know, he is very brave, especially with all of the opposition he will face.

This is how stupid the press thinks you are, even though they believe their own lies, they actually spin this as interparty drama - making out that the parties dislike each other and are at war all off all the time. High politics this is!

Both arms of the money power's liberal press realise they require conflict to prop each other up. By creating superficial attacks on elements of conservatism the right wing press much keep people's faith in it's political party - despite every day complaining about things like this whilst conveniently forgetting the responsibility of the current government. It is more than convenience. Likewise the left wing maintains the theatrics of petty self satisfied egalitarian jeering, standing for principles and giving one to David - while in reality they need the Tories to stay large so the party can sustain a liberal elite and take on its own back benchers. Though I should add this section of the press is printed exclusively for smug self satisfied trendy arseholes and neckbearded politics faggots who love the smell of their own farts, it is the extent of the other side.

The social tensions behind this summer’s rioting must not be ignored, Nick Clegg will warn today.

The Deputy Prime Minister will use his flagship conference speech to insist many of the looters had ‘lost touch with their own future’ because they had been let down by society.

Mr Clegg will also announce a £50million scheme to offer 100,000 disadvantaged children two weeks of summer school at the age of 11 to help them to ‘catch up and get ready for the challenges ahead’.

But it is the Lib Dem leader’s language on the riots that will cause most controversy.

He will try to rally traditional supporters by distancing himself from the Conservatives over law and order.

Are these not the policies that David Cameron endorses? this is a warning to us that we need to test our tolerance over the coming months.

Politics is generally speaking a bad thing. Liberals use it well, they have all these narratives to prop up the illusion of a multi party system, and diffuse dissent by confusing the British people and getting them to fight amongst themselves. The parties are all the same, it is the same political elite, the same followers, all trying to kill us! - all committed to the same aims and goals heading towards our destruction.

The same can not be said for us, we seem to achive the opposite effect of remaining inconsistant defensive, and confused. We have to learn to attack, to take an offensive position in exposing the contradictions of fake politics, get people to realise it is not this party and that party, but us and them. If you get people to hate politicians, make them realise they have been conned, they will hate. People have short memories as these article proves, remind them of the things they have done to us - make them aware that they are part of a national group that is under attack. Abandon politics, that is not what is imporant, you have to get the nation to see the anti nation and set it on a colission course. Do your part to expose political theatre and help bring about it's destruction.

Is your Baby racist?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2037050/Racists-aged-THREE-Children-accused-bigotry-broccoli-head-calling.html#ixzz1Y9ADlgH1

> Teachers are branding thousands of children racist or homophobic following playground squabbles. More than 20,000 pupils aged 11 or younger were last year put on record for so-called hate crimes such as using the word ‘gaylord’. Some of them are even from nursery schools where children are no older than three.
> One youngster was accused of being racist for calling a boy ‘broccoli head’ and another was said to be homophobic for telling a teacher ‘this work is gay’. Two primary school children were reported for homophobia after quarrelling over a rubber and calling each other ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’.
>Schools are forced to report the language to education authorities, which keep a register of incidents.Although the Department for Education recently pledged to cut unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy, it has given no guidance on such ‘offences’. In total, 34,000 nursery, primary and secondary pupils were effectively classed as bigots because of anti-bullying rules.
> The school can keep the pupil’s name and ‘crime’ on file. The record can be passed from primaries to secondaries or when a pupil moves between schools. And if schools are asked for a pupil reference by a future employer or a university, the record could be used as the basis for it, meaning the pettiest of incidents has the potential to blight a child for life.
> The figures show 34,000 racist incidents reported by schools to local education authorities in England and Wales. Of these, 20,000 were at primary schools.
> Schools were required by the Labour government in 2002 to monitor and report all racist incidents to their local authority. Teachers must name the alleged perpetrator and victim and spell out the incident and the punishment. Local authority records show the type of incident but not the name of the child involved.

This may shock you, even frighten you a little. You may think how you can even comment on a story like this, because of how serious this is. the truth is it IS very serious, but this is the state of things all the time, Things are always in black and white. All I see here is allegedly hamless ideas that nobody blinks an eye to being taken to a logical conclusion; A list is how a totalitarian system functions if it wants to ensure its survival, the weaklings and the ones that think improperly you need to collect and do something about them otherwise they cause you problems. From a liberal perspective it could be seen as incredibly humane, a good start in life to correct the moral thinking of a toddler who would otherwise nurture his bad thoughts and grow up to do something worse. Why not?

As a system for streaming the potentially 'bigoted' it is horribly inefficient and pointless - I mean they are kids right? the 'treatment' is basically random and arbitrary. I mean, how are they supposed to get their heads around the semiotics of a cultural Marxist social construct to accept it in the affirmative or negative? They wouldn't have got me, that's for sure! outwardly I ate up so much of that garbage they fed me in the humanities classes that I could have been a professor of discrimination studies. I remember having one unrecorded incident aged 11 when I might have said something I shouldn't, I but instantly realising what I said I froze completely and began begging forgiveness, pity was taken upon me.

So I like it when our people get upset by something, It is good! They are realising they have been conned - That will make them angry - then will come action! it shows people the destructive and ruthless nature of what we have, and that ultimately it is a choice between Cultural Communism or Cultural Fascism and time is running short.

A Liberal I knew said he didn't care about stories like these other than framing them negatively was a bad thing, it is something we should embrace because it keeps us from the alternative - Fascism, back to the 1950's, etc. If pissing off a few moaning (but otherwise harmless) mail readers All the better!

My advice is don't get mad, do something about it. What are you upset about? A list? We can make a list as well you numpkin! A list is just a list, some people will fear just being on any kind of list, but really it isn't what matters - what matters is that unlike this pathetic piece of government legislation ours would have a legitimate Iron Fist behind it - the infinite scorn of the people and their will to hand out their own form of justice.

All the teachers, the school officials, the 'community leaders', the bureaucrats, the politicians - Everybody who was part of this attempt to destroy us, everybody who is part of the anti-nation - They get their own list as well; Their names and addresses along with their crimes and we will act on them.

Never despair. there is plently of time to see justice done.

Why I hate...

U mad? hate is a very powerful emotion.

Personally, I cannot descibe how angry things like this make me, and it is made all the worse that you have to ignore it - you are supposed to pretend everything is alwayswonderful and we live in some peaceful communist fagfuck utopia. 'problems in society?' are only the indirect cause of intollerance in society. All year round from age one you are have this false ideology shoved down your throat, even from preschool. You can't have an opinion on it, You can't discuss it, you can't vote on it, etcetera etcetera.

Despite this I have never met a true humanist. In regards to the holocaust, starving Africans, all the causes we are supposed to care about I have never seen anyone actually give an actual fuck, though they might pretend to - it is only because they wish it meant something to them.

Even liberals I know cannot explain why it is they sponsor Africans, to me it just doesn't make sense how you can be so connected to something without any real information or knowledge on the subject - It is obvious for what it is a selfish charade to validate their existence. Humanism is unhuman, it is not based on reality, it is a suicidal attitude of warmness to everything whilst simultaneously knowing nothing about it - make belief for adults who see the world in happy rainbows. this is why they so vigorously suppress the truth, they fear it.

I do not think it is possible to ever know the suffering of some great 'tragedy', to presume you have that kind of connection is more than arrogant. On the other hand the only time I have ever seen friends and family get angry is over is over stuff like this. Otto Strasser said that Hate must be born of love - we hate because it is based on something that is real, because we think collectively in the very real sense. Nationalism is the only socialism. When you see your country attacked, or something that is sacred to you, The pain you feel is not a self entitled ago trip it hits you personally - It is an attack on your borders, your identity, your survival, your sense of security. It makes sense evolutionarily, it is a survival mechanism that is trying to tell your body that you need act!

This is worth baring in mind when your relative frowns at the cover of the Daily mail or some libtard tells you that everything about you is just a social construct.