Integral Nation!

So... another year has passed and predictably the seemingly unavoidable decline of the British people and nation is still in full swing. Every day, week and month has brought the same news that is familiar to one and all – more broken promises, more corruption, more treason and more suffering.

No end of the decline under the present system is in sight, however we must never assume it is terminal. Those who think our people are asleep, that the struggle is pointless and that we will continually drift into disaster are wrong... For years we have been exploited by the international and financial gangsters, treasonous elite, Liberal/Marxist cancers and by the vices of sectionalism. The British people are very much awake; they know the system has failed and that the liberal democratic parties and politicians have failed, they know they have been sold down the river – they know they need an Alternative!

The true alternative is being found by the hearts of an ever increasing number of our people every minute of every hour – an end to the old degradation and rot, and the start of a grand new beginning! One nation of classes united in national feeling, one government in an uncompromising patriotism and action, giving strength and joy to a true homogeneous community of people. An Integral Nation!

We in Britain want nothing short of a revolution, a revolution in every sphere of life. We call for new government, a new system and a new man for a grand modern age of splendor and greatness. This is not a petty dream, this is an upcoming reality and Britain and Europe will become great again. The 21^st century is ours!

Many in ‘our movement’ in parties like UKIP or the BNP believe a simple petty return to the 1950’s or some similar era will cure our ills, many of them think moaning and groaning like Victor Meldrew or Alf Garnett will somehow win the hearts and minds of the British people – no ideals or action, simply bland and meaningless jibber being constructed so as to show our ‘legitimacy’ to the illegitimate elite, and to hide the fear they have of their own beliefs.

How can people join our ranks with a mentality such as this? Self-Hatred is a disease of the weak-minded. The British people are crying for a new elite, who know what they are and know what they are doing. We cannot simply be moaners and reactionaries, clueless and scared... We must show ourselves as this new elite, unrelenting and firm in principle who can provide a future of action for the British people. After all the chaos, disorder and suffering of the old world our people cry!

Join our ranks, answer the calls and together let us build a Greater Britain!

Recent Observations and Thoughts

I hear the word bankster being spoken often in general conversation by the public these days, who increasingly out of necessity are compelled to find out the root course of a crisis that threatens the whole material basis of the life they are building for themselves, preventing their happiness and ability to support a family.  Resulting from the world financial crisis of 2011 when the global economy was, and is faced, with a potential greater crisis than that of 1929. Since that time the world economy has been unable to settle.  Warped beyond reasonable proportions, the US military industry is finding it increasingly hard to justify itself as it continues to expand, increasing its bases across the world, tied in with the aims of lobby groups there.  The debt, national and personal, cannot be paid back to the finance houses that privately fund the central banks.  A privately owned global monetary system which knows no international barriers, indeed has been very effective in breaking these down through political and militarily means.  A system of money based on the creation of debt;  Debt is needed for the central banks to create money valued on the debt future interest profit – leveraged up and up, re-lent, hypothecated , re-hypothecated, speculatively invested on the chance of assets rising. A bubble of fiat money that has no real worth.  Lots of fiat money for city traders to gamble on the volatility of the bulls and bears, then off to spend the commissions on white powder, escorts and sports cars. The money changers have been working hard to debase the nations internally because that makes them easier to exploit; the UK in recent times has seen the introduction of parliaments, city councils, and regional assemblies which undermines the concept of the state as the legislative expression of a national will, but as an administration to be served – International finance governs Britain and knows that creating endless tiers of government will crystallise their power should the people ever recover their strength. The ambitions and gains of the Scottish National party is the clearest expression of how an expansion in the democratic process enhances the willingness to small parties to sell their souls to the devil as willing debt slaves in order to achieve their questionable goals – empowerment and representation to secessionists, immigrant/faggot/religious/scene ‘communities’, are all example of this.  

 When the people of a nation such as Greece were offered by their government the choice of whether they wanted to be saddled with debt, their leader was branded a lunatic by a media campaign and replaced by the EU with a more compliant leadership. This has lead Greeks to the only option of challenging the world system namely Nationalism in the form of the Golden Dawn party.  Nations cannot now let fellow nations fail as they have lent widely and invested across borders and so are tied to the same system. If theoretically any nation were to break free from financial slavery and refuse to pay the gratuitous payments to these vipers, then the people of Europe would then see how they had been robbed when they had willingly given such payments. Other nations which prove more difficult to control have the media set against them and following military intervention a central bank is set up, privately financed by the same international financiers and corporations.  New debt slaves are created, and the worlds few beneficiaries of this system will reap the interest profit for generations.  Private money and the supreme imperium it comes with.

The present situation in which we find ourselves clearly highlights the priorities of our rulers and the purpose of system they maintain.  The international financer takes as much profit as possible from the differing administrative areas of the Earth, deciding on policy for western nations though the private international clubs where they meet political and media men, money flows and private mutual  interests are perused.  Our present government’s business secretary tells the people that they are ‘’fighting an economic war’’ in order to restore the nations prosperity.  The way they wage this war however seems to be to remove the spending power from the majority of the nation’s people; utilities prices are high, fuel prices at a record high, food is expensive, VAT up, taxes up.  If people don’t have money in their pocket then they cannot spend it.  Money is there, it is just not distributed amongst the people.  Money flies out of this country in all directions, leaving aside the strange and increasingly indefensible foreign aid expenditure (a government minister was recently defending in an interview the millions being spent by UK tax payers on Indian start up business saying this ‘’will benefit the UK’’), the very wealthy avoid paying tax though various off shore arrangements and I don’t blame them.  Even the most nationalistic minded of wealthy individuals would have an issue giving half of their income to a government which in itself is not nationalistic and wastes revenue money on bazaar projects.  One of the government’s main preoccupations is attracting foreign investment; they prise triumphal events when a British business is bought out by foreign investors.  The main bulk of profit for the business then goes abroad to these investor/speculators to be spent in most cases abroad, and when the time comes that it is more cost effective to shut the whole of the UK operation (as there is usually a period of moving parts of the business abroad), that’s what they do.  Premiership football best represents the model of a sizable British business; foreign owned, using the old British brand, with foreign players and foreign fans.  All the UK public have to do is pay in, buy tickets and merchandise.  Many of the recent great mass off immigrant’s lobbied by financial interest to come here for a more competitive UK labour market (lower workers wages), send money earned here abroad to their families.  Executives take huge bonuses and do not spend this money in the real economy, they may prefer to buy a house on the Dubai palm island and buy their clothes from designer boutiques perhaps in Milan, meanwhile their workers are just scraping by.  Topped with large international bailouts for a rotten world system and contributions to the European Union organisation, which is anything but European in character, we have a great scarcity of money.

The government needs to put money in the pockets off the masses before they can spend it.  Any profits this country makes should be given back to the people in the form of the national dividend over and above wages and to the out of work. This is after all the people’s money which they earned, and presently it is taken away to get lost in the global system of finance.  Businesses will then have customers; the business then may grow and create more jobs.  Those who feel inclined to begin new enterprises could be provided with the funding from a nationalised credit provider that only provides credit for wealth creating ventures not speculative ones.  Henry Ford became one of the 20^th century’s most successful businessmen by raising the wages of his workers so they could buy the motor cars they were building, and what works on the micro as with this example, works on the macro with regards the nation.  Let the peoples government decide on how much money needs to be printed, not private boards of individuals in central banks.  The monetary system we have should be to aid the human condition, not to enslave people to individual misery and interest payments.  By giving people social credit and the national dividend we remove power from the international viper and give it to the people. The present establishment and government will not allow this as they are the viper’s representatives, though in fairness I’m sure the majority of our elected representative’s act out of stupidity and cowardice.  Before a shift in power can be brought about, the people will have to unite and be ruthless and unforgiving in pursuit of their goals in order to change the system.  The vested powers will not give in and are themselves ruthless and unforgiving.       

This current system, the creation of dept to print money leading to booms, busts and the economics that brings war is a true nightmare for us all.  There are alternatives and it is the responsibility of those who are aware to educate and raise the consciousness of their fellow man, as only by standing together will we help bring about real change.    

Right to rule

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102478/Edwina-Currie-reduces-struggling-mother-tears-live-radio-putting-debts-living-good-life-indeed.html

The level to which the aristocracy has sunk is becoming an embarrassment, they are an absolute bloody disgrace – What do their children know today other than piano lessons and Harry Potter. For the past fifty years things have gotten worse and worse for our people and this priveledged class have lived in a god damn bubble – the revelation of such callous ignorance from people of the same nation is painful, because they used to represent an elite superior to any other in the world.

I really do admire Winston Churchill in a way because he was a ruthless, chauvanist, snobbish, grade A cunt - and he, like every prime minister and general before him never pretended to be anything else. As a leader he operated with disregard for the human lives around him, much like any other world leader at the time, but basically, Churchill and the elite he represented had 'Patriotism' on some level. Now it might be the case that' that definition might have excluded most of the population it was none the less a faith in and upholdance of the basic structures that underpin our being - That is what makes it all worth it. This fish eyed venomous Harridan on the other hand is just ignorant. Indeed I believe this is why Leftists use the term ‘ignorant’ to describe our position, as if listening to their moralising would change our view, really they should just call us evil – But that is beside the point.

If I am going to be commanded it should be by somebody who is superior to myself that represents something greater than I or my ambitions. Our people have never questioned the class system in any real way because they had a sense of pride in themselves, they didn’t look for others and knew ultimately only they could bring themselves out of the dirt – nobody questioned the kings and officials and scrutinised whether they deserved everything he had - we let them have through an agreement to mutual ignorance because we had pride in ourselves. If we sat and demanded somebody take care of us, then we would not be worthy of such charity, there can be no charity and neediness for our people - Saxons and bezerker Viking killers reduced to 'gibz me dat, who gonna feed mah baybiez'.

Virtually the first thing I ever learned to hate was a Tory; that a person could be so indifferent to the suffering of a people – it is the aspect of leftism that I hate – their indifference to our culture. As an individual though the cultural Marxist is just an enemy, a man for off in the distance in an entrenched position; we have our side, they have theirs I wouldn’t have it any other way, I don’t want to invite them or win them over or make them my friend. A red is willing to fight what it perceives as evil, all the aristocracy care about is though their god damn money, and so they fight for that life that is theirs - no wonder the country was so easily taken over.
They have preached responsibility to me my whole life, but I don’t see them taking a single one of theirs. Knowing them they are very bitter and angry – like us, they don’t like the new left elite, and they feel entitled without ever questioning WHY they declined. The Churchills of this world never really died out, they became vacuous and lazy so willingly allowed the deliberately evil to rule in their place. What we need is new leadership that is part of the people and know their problems, know the struggles and the poverty that have continued unchanged. Unpaid electricity bills, jacked up rents, expensive living, cold in winter – this is life for most people, unchanged amazingly in 40 years. That it never even occurred to Edwina Currie that our people are actually fighting out there and didn’t just choose to live this way is proof of all of this.

Reality check

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/12/breaking-tommy-robinson-attacked-by.html


Tommy Robinson, head of the English Defence League, was waylaid and severely beaten by a group of Pakistanis shouting, "Allahu akhbar" and "Merry Christmas, Tommy." He was in the hospital for a brain scan and has been released. Gates of Vienna has the story and photos of Robinson's badly bruised face, though details are still scant.


Despite the fact this would probably constitute whatever equivalent we have for a hate crime and this is an individual of nominal political significance he media is unlikely to even run a story on it. Goes to show this is serious business doesn't it? People keep saying that this is the sort of thing that gets people to sympathise with us; Tommy seemed like such a nice chap with his protestations of peace and his condemnation of this that and the other. You have that incident when an EDL woman was set upon by a group of antifascists alighting a bus that had bricks thrown at it - all passengers arrested. Many are under the impression that mounting injustice is what is needed to win, this has been BNP policy for a long time.

you are all wrong. Being a victim never helped anyone -it is sad, but not inspiring, and have we all not heard the story before that the British people would be receptive to a non extremist far right party- low and behold this arrives in the form of the EDL and that line was quickly dropped.

You need to face facts that nobody will ever like what you do until the shoe is on the other foot. Being a victim is nothing to be proud of, it is an embarrassment, it is a representation of weakness. As a christian organisation the EDL should know that an enemy cannot be defeated one handed; that the Shield arm the martyrs of Christ only have meaning because the strength of the sword arm made all that suffering and resistance a means to obtain an end.

Gandhi was able to wage his programme of non-violent resistance because he was able to offer a human wall of flesh - the only weapon available to him against the bullets, to make his people suffer like christ on the cross and run the streets with their blood until the moral weakness of the British establishment tired of the slaughter. The challenge we face is that not only does our enemy consider us non-humans fit for genocide and and secretly applaud when one of our own falls, - to degrade a great people when there are hardly any of us, and just send them like goats to the slaughter is not an option, and goes against our whole mentality.

Only a movement of strength lives in appreciation for the task of survival and the victory that will come. Only when you establish a power relationship with your enemies do you exist in a state of struggle and have any bargaining power.

Our people don't think emotionally or spiritually in that way, for us, strategy is a matter of constitution, of numbers, opportunities, and most of all strength in relation to the adversary - what I propose is coming to the game with a game plan to inspire the confidence we need.

Blowback

In the 16th century sir Thomas Moore was discussing the role of law with his clerk. The clerk asked Sir Thomas whether or not it would be permissible to ignore the law in order to accomplish a good result. Thomas moore said that the law was like the trees of a forest "would you be willing to chop down those trees in your efforts to apprehend the devil". The clerk replied in the affirmative, and sir Thomas Moore said "and when you finally came upon the devil and the devil turned upon you, behind which tree would you hide?"

A month ago the left celebrated the 'Battle of Cable street' in what was a pathetic communist event with UAF speakers and a Karl Marx reading evening. What they were celebrating was the passage of the public order act - a piece of law justified for it's use against fascists, yet has been the bane of the left. It is felt most by our baby students who even today feel the effects of the legislation; all protests especially the recent marches against the cuts are all proscribed by the police under the public order act. The Organisers have to get police permission to march, or they can't march at all, they are told what their route is, and even then half the met is mobilized against them and just treat them like an illegal march anyway, arresting anyone they feel like. These kids, payed up members of the political class, labour party supporters, the children of elites suffer the full treatment.

Fascists in the 1930's on the other hand, who obeyed the law and had special relations with the police remained unaffected apart from having to remove their uniforms (Even this stipulation was not always observed). It can be argued this even benefited the BUF (for internal political reasons) who were also never once prosecuted under this act. though we all follow the same law far right marches have not really been a phenomena since the 1970's during the early days of the National Front, the public order act does not affect a single British patriot.

Despite all this, the left see absolutely no contradiction in their support for draconian law and support for their own civil rights, to them it was 'worth it'.

It isn't just the left that does this. British Muslims too fought bitterly for the passing of the incitement to religious hatred bill, which was more or less handed to them by Blair as compensation for the war. They thought this would elevate them to Jew status in the eyes of the law, making it open season on islamaphobes. In reality more Muslims have been arrested under thie bill than any other group. The Pattern of irony just kills me.

It is not that these people are all inherently stupid, or that the results of these were unforeseen - it is in their ideological nature to expunge all counter revolutionaries; it is the view that makes a priority of killing all your ideological opponents over fighting the real enemy, it is purism and the ends justifying the means. How many times have you seen some shred sanity calling for caution written by some Civil liberties type, or some red from the guardian? all warning about the terrible consequences for the society of bringing in oppressive laws just for some moot point. it is wasted on the minds of the brainless. all you have to do is get them on their PC line and they all scream for blood. Just open a history book and look at the exceptional cruelty people are capable of when they hate.

Hate and violence is something our society is full of, yet it is always the weaker among us (particularly our own people on the far right) who are always advising against this being manifested in our own attitude, that such crudeness will alienate us, they don't understand how the hive mind works.

In the recent tram episode millions joined the twitter mob who demonstrating their liberal credentials by making demands that the offending woman should be sterilized and executed. Being shot seems to be what is trending the most. Even the Labour party leader Ed Miliband called on his supporters to ‘identify the woman shouting racist abuse on a tram in London'. Piers Morgan has suggested even deporting the "racist tram lady", - has Piers not considered though, that most of the population would like to see him deported out of a cannon into a brick wall?

The difference between us and them is they have no real enemy. People like the 'racist tram lady' was an ordinary person in the wrong place at the wrong time doing something she shouldn't. Our leaders though, the political class, and all the others - there is no word for these people other than that of pure and absolute evil, they are complete criminals against humanity. they DO deserve what WILL come to them.

All these weak minded and emotional people, along with their limp conservatives cohorts do not realise the manner in which they are digging their own graves. By their actions they are sewing the seeds for hysteria and hatred in society needed for the success of diametrically opposite social movement. The recent comedy program black mirror showed how twitter forced the prime minister of the united kingdom to have sex with a pig, it was a warning on the power of social communication in it's ability for unpredictability and evil, to unravel everything they built over the last fifty years. Already they are busy tearing down all the social and legal structures that would protect them - if the forces of law and order had to take power all the provisions to have the current government shot are already in existence, it is only a matter of time before people's movements begin to wield power, and with the hatred of the masses behind us it will be absolute slaughter.

Crime of the century

it happened people, racism has occurred. This thing has gone pretty much viral and left our nation in shock, we simply were not prepared.

This is literally the worst thing any individual can do, it is an act so evil that it occurs in a vacuum! A rapist or a murderer, or a paedophile not only has more rights than they deserve but their crimes are committed in a very complex sociological network. As a humanities and sociology student it was explained to me that even the most individual of human decisions are determined by an outlaying set of causal factors based on society's failings. Most forms of petty crime are you see, are directly correlated with relative deprivation which the individual becomes conscious of and revolt against. low life ghetto thugs understand concepts of class and universal processes of dialectical materialism - so their turning to crime is really the product of neglect and discrimination. Humanitarianists look with disgust at proponents of the death penalty and feel they take the moral high ground against barbaric treatments.

In this case though everyone has been thrown into temporary collective insanity The Daily Mail claims to be shocked and disgusted. Yes she should have been detained - for shouting and babbling on public transportation, but that will not be what she is charged for. In addition to the public lynching she will experience over the next few months, under the incitement to racial hatred act and god knows what else this woman will;
- Lose her job
- Go to prison
- Lose her child
If she is found guilty.

'Hate' - that word again, what does it mean? This goes against everything I was taught under the logic of Marxism; that Prejudice and bigotry is unnatural - after all if intolerance is the product of capitalism as a means to divide the working class is this woman not just as much a victim as the asylum seeker who steals to feed himself. What happened to what we were always taught 'you were not there' 'did you know their home life' 'what racism have they experienced' - The first defence is always that we cannot judge an event when it was not captured from the start. What happened to all these arguments? What do you think this woman felt; anger, sadness, desperation - are we to say that these were entirely irrational - she simply broke out in a rash of bigotry or could it be that something caused that?

See this comment and tell me if a part of you feels hate?
This is England being told.


Whatever you thought of this incident, if you are British and you felt something, then you are no better in the eyes of the powers that be than that woman. perhaps you now understand the great task they face - this is just a side effect of repression, one woman exploding. In the next decade we are going to see hundreds of these clips, there are already many like them; old people being taunted by a gang of youths with mobile phones, people like the woman on public transport with everyone around her speaking a foreign language. Every one of these I regard as a victory, because in my eyes it lays the blame squarely at the feet of those who were responsible. This is the sound of the multicult crashing down; it is going to start with things like this, and move up and up, and get worse! For once, I say that it should be the people in power who are made to answer for the mess they have created on the day of the rope.

Commoner Kate Attends Remembrance Ceremony

Relating article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060993/Regal-Duchess-Cambridge-attends-Remembrance-Sunday-ceremony-member-monarchy.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The Daily Mail today took it upon themselves to publish an article detailing the garments worn by the Duchess of Cambridge at the Remembrance Day ceremony.

I've never identified closely to the Royal family. For a long time I never took much more than a passing interest in the affairs of the Royals - and I find that many others share the same disinterest. The Royalists of our time tend to be  female, and either high society socialites or nouveau riche wannabes. But this article immediately drew my attention and for no good reason.

We've long been aware of how the cult of celebrity that now reigns supreme over popular cultural life - the media has replaced heroic idols with reality TV personalities, like our friends off Big Brother - the host of the Weakest Link(if she is still around) - or the bloke that does the weather forecast. People through a process of conditioning and the resulting total saturation in a fairytale, liberal utopian world; filled with STDs, aborted foetuses and paedophiles aplenty. What I had never noticed before is how deeply ingrained, that staunch bastion of traditional British virtue and manner, the Royal Family, has been in the whole charade propagated by the media outlets. They've been totally amalgamated into the whole showbiz, gossip column, bull-shit parade. The article is a stereotypical piece, the exemplification of the shit the press wheels out every day - "But there was plenty of room to make a fashion statement" - I mean, really, what the hell goes through a Woman's mind when you write that and why aren't the Royals kicking a shit-storm up about it? I know if someone wrote an article on what I was wearing at a sombre event like Armistice Sunday I would kick-off.

I know little, why people get such a buzz off reading about what frock Kate is wearing and what hat Camilla is wearing - why tabloids and broadsheets alike spend fuck loads on journalist parasites to spy on the movement of these pampered princesses' that have never done an honest days labour and never accomplished anything worthwhile. Indeed my greatest criticism of the monarchy and the rest of the aristocracy is that they serve no purpose other than to serve as trimmings at any major national occasion - Remembrance Day for instance.

I would have a more sympathetic view towards those who follow the monarchy - who seem to resemble toffs clinging forlornly to the last vestige of Britain's Imperial past - and the monarchy itself, if it at least embodied the values the values and virtues that made this country great: courage, honour, loyalty. The Royals show none of these; courage, they lacked when refusing to face up to the career politicians in Westminster began selling us out to the European Union and giving away our countries Common Wealth to the big-business monopolies. They lacked honour when Charles married Camila and turned the other cheek when our forces were sent into the third-world hell holes of Iraq and Afghanistan. They lacked loyalty to one another when they succumb to playing the media game. To cap it all of they've shown not just a deficit in the virtues necessary to rule and a failure to acknowledge age-old duty but they also seem to think themselves entitled to privilege and respect; riches and luxury - whilst contributing nothing to the national good, other than, more column inches in the tabloid press.

Get In There SON!

This leads to bigger questions over the role of the monarchy - it is tradition - something unique to the British political system - a 1000 year-old institution, in its current form. That is an Integral part of what I myself stand for and what Integralism stands for - tradition and heritage. But when you have Queen Elizabeth keeping schtum over the Great Betrayal to Brussels and Strasbourg. Prince Harry doing the business with any bird going - the Duke of Edinburgh making a general nuisance of himself. Coupled with the Royals' inability to perform a real constitutional function over than act as patron and figurehead - giving approval and legitimacy to treasonous policy.

There are many patriots out there who feel the Royal family to be nothing short of sacrosanct; this is a negative notion, and would be potentially harmful if that mindset was implemented when in power. When the monarchy as it stands has been debased by the media and lost the respect and inviolable position it once commanded. When we take power the Royal family will be given an ultimatum: either get your act together - restore your sense of honour, dignity and duty; restore the respect of the masses; restore respect for the ancient institutions. Otherwise, expect radical change in the constitutional framework of the UK - with the current Royal family replaced and regal status of the monarchy resumed by the introduction of new blood, as part of the renaissance of the British Nation.

Remember - this is a just soverign ruler - this the soverign ruler of yesteryear.