Friday 23 December 2011

Reality check


http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/12/breaking-tommy-robinson-attacked-by.html


Tommy Robinson, head of the English Defence League, was waylaid and severely beaten by a group of Pakistanis shouting, "Allahu akhbar" and "Merry Christmas, Tommy." He was in the hospital for a brain scan and has been released. Gates of Vienna has the story and photos of Robinson's badly bruised face, though details are still scant.


Despite the fact this would probably constitute whatever equivalent we have for a hate crime and this is an individual of nominal political significance he media is unlikely to even run a story on it. Goes to show this is serious business doesn't it? People keep saying that this is the sort of thing that gets people to sympathise with us; Tommy seemed like such a nice chap with his protestations of peace and his condemnation of this that and the other. You have that incident when an EDL woman was set upon by a group of antifascists alighting a bus that had bricks thrown at it - all passengers arrested. Many are under the impression that mounting injustice is what is needed to win, this has been BNP policy for a long time.

you are all wrong. Being a victim never helped anyone -it is sad, but not inspiring, and have we all not heard the story before that the British people would be receptive to a non extremist far right party- low and behold this arrives in the form of the EDL and that line was quickly dropped.

You need to face facts that nobody will ever like what you do until the shoe is on the other foot. Being a victim is nothing to be proud of, it is an embarrassment, it is a representation of weakness. As a christian organisation the EDL should know that an enemy cannot be defeated one handed; that the Shield arm the martyrs of Christ only have meaning because the strength of the sword arm made all that suffering and resistance a means to obtain an end.

Gandhi was able to wage his programme of non-violent resistance because he was able to offer a human wall of flesh - the only weapon available to him against the bullets, to make his people suffer like christ on the cross and run the streets with their blood until the moral weakness of the British establishment tired of the slaughter. The challenge we face is that not only does our enemy consider us non-humans fit for genocide and and secretly applaud when one of our own falls, - to degrade a great people when there are hardly any of us, and just send them like goats to the slaughter is not an option, and goes against our whole mentality.

Only a movement of strength lives in appreciation for the task of survival and the victory that will come. Only when you establish a power relationship with your enemies do you exist in a state of struggle and have any bargaining power.

Our people don't think emotionally or spiritually in that way, for us, strategy is a matter of constitution, of numbers, opportunities, and most of all strength in relation to the adversary - what I propose is coming to the game with a game plan to inspire the confidence we need.

Friday 2 December 2011

Blowback

In the 16th century sir Thomas Moore was discussing the role of law with his clerk. The clerk asked Sir Thomas whether or not it would be permissible to ignore the law in order to accomplish a good result. Thomas moore said that the law was like the trees of a forest "would you be willing to chop down those trees in your efforts to apprehend the devil". The clerk replied in the affirmative, and sir Thomas Moore said "and when you finally came upon the devil and the devil turned upon you, behind which tree would you hide?"

A month ago the left celebrated the 'Battle of Cable street' in what was a pathetic communist event with UAF speakers and a Karl Marx reading evening. What they were celebrating was the passage of the public order act - a piece of law justified for it's use against fascists, yet has been the bane of the left. It is felt most by our baby students who even today feel the effects of the legislation; all protests especially the recent marches against the cuts are all proscribed by the police under the public order act. The Organisers have to get police permission to march, or they can't march at all, they are told what their route is, and even then half the met is mobilized against them and just treat them like an illegal march anyway, arresting anyone they feel like. These kids, payed up members of the political class, labour party supporters, the children of elites suffer the full treatment.

Fascists in the 1930's on the other hand, who obeyed the law and had special relations with the police remained unaffected apart from having to remove their uniforms (Even this stipulation was not always observed). It can be argued this even benefited the BUF (for internal political reasons) who were also never once prosecuted under this act. though we all follow the same law far right marches have not really been a phenomena since the 1970's during the early days of the National Front, the public order act does not affect a single British patriot.

Despite all this, the left see absolutely no contradiction in their support for draconian law and support for their own civil rights, to them it was 'worth it'.

It isn't just the left that does this. British Muslims too fought bitterly for the passing of the incitement to religious hatred bill, which was more or less handed to them by Blair as compensation for the war. They thought this would elevate them to Jew status in the eyes of the law, making it open season on islamaphobes. In reality more Muslims have been arrested under thie bill than any other group. The Pattern of irony just kills me.

It is not that these people are all inherently stupid, or that the results of these were unforeseen - it is in their ideological nature to expunge all counter revolutionaries; it is the view that makes a priority of killing all your ideological opponents over fighting the real enemy, it is purism and the ends justifying the means. How many times have you seen some shred sanity calling for caution written by some Civil liberties type, or some red from the guardian? all warning about the terrible consequences for the society of bringing in oppressive laws just for some moot point. it is wasted on the minds of the brainless. all you have to do is get them on their PC line and they all scream for blood. Just open a history book and look at the exceptional cruelty people are capable of when they hate.

Hate and violence is something our society is full of, yet it is always the weaker among us (particularly our own people on the far right) who are always advising against this being manifested in our own attitude, that such crudeness will alienate us, they don't understand how the hive mind works.

In the recent tram episode millions joined the twitter mob who demonstrating their liberal credentials by making demands that the offending woman should be sterilized and executed. Being shot seems to be what is trending the most. Even the Labour party leader Ed Miliband called on his supporters to ‘identify the woman shouting racist abuse on a tram in London'. Piers Morgan has suggested even deporting the "racist tram lady", - has Piers not considered though, that most of the population would like to see him deported out of a cannon into a brick wall?

The difference between us and them is they have no real enemy. People like the 'racist tram lady' was an ordinary person in the wrong place at the wrong time doing something she shouldn't. Our leaders though, the political class, and all the others - there is no word for these people other than that of pure and absolute evil, they are complete criminals against humanity. they DO deserve what WILL come to them.

All these weak minded and emotional people, along with their limp conservatives cohorts do not realise the manner in which they are digging their own graves. By their actions they are sewing the seeds for hysteria and hatred in society needed for the success of diametrically opposite social movement. The recent comedy program black mirror showed how twitter forced the prime minister of the united kingdom to have sex with a pig, it was a warning on the power of social communication in it's ability for unpredictability and evil, to unravel everything they built over the last fifty years. Already they are busy tearing down all the social and legal structures that would protect them - if the forces of law and order had to take power all the provisions to have the current government shot are already in existence, it is only a matter of time before people's movements begin to wield power, and with the hatred of the masses behind us it will be absolute slaughter.