Reality check

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/12/breaking-tommy-robinson-attacked-by.html


Tommy Robinson, head of the English Defence League, was waylaid and severely beaten by a group of Pakistanis shouting, "Allahu akhbar" and "Merry Christmas, Tommy." He was in the hospital for a brain scan and has been released. Gates of Vienna has the story and photos of Robinson's badly bruised face, though details are still scant.


Despite the fact this would probably constitute whatever equivalent we have for a hate crime and this is an individual of nominal political significance he media is unlikely to even run a story on it. Goes to show this is serious business doesn't it? People keep saying that this is the sort of thing that gets people to sympathise with us; Tommy seemed like such a nice chap with his protestations of peace and his condemnation of this that and the other. You have that incident when an EDL woman was set upon by a group of antifascists alighting a bus that had bricks thrown at it - all passengers arrested. Many are under the impression that mounting injustice is what is needed to win, this has been BNP policy for a long time.

you are all wrong. Being a victim never helped anyone -it is sad, but not inspiring, and have we all not heard the story before that the British people would be receptive to a non extremist far right party- low and behold this arrives in the form of the EDL and that line was quickly dropped.

You need to face facts that nobody will ever like what you do until the shoe is on the other foot. Being a victim is nothing to be proud of, it is an embarrassment, it is a representation of weakness. As a christian organisation the EDL should know that an enemy cannot be defeated one handed; that the Shield arm the martyrs of Christ only have meaning because the strength of the sword arm made all that suffering and resistance a means to obtain an end.

Gandhi was able to wage his programme of non-violent resistance because he was able to offer a human wall of flesh - the only weapon available to him against the bullets, to make his people suffer like christ on the cross and run the streets with their blood until the moral weakness of the British establishment tired of the slaughter. The challenge we face is that not only does our enemy consider us non-humans fit for genocide and and secretly applaud when one of our own falls, - to degrade a great people when there are hardly any of us, and just send them like goats to the slaughter is not an option, and goes against our whole mentality.

Only a movement of strength lives in appreciation for the task of survival and the victory that will come. Only when you establish a power relationship with your enemies do you exist in a state of struggle and have any bargaining power.

Our people don't think emotionally or spiritually in that way, for us, strategy is a matter of constitution, of numbers, opportunities, and most of all strength in relation to the adversary - what I propose is coming to the game with a game plan to inspire the confidence we need.

Blowback

In the 16th century sir Thomas Moore was discussing the role of law with his clerk. The clerk asked Sir Thomas whether or not it would be permissible to ignore the law in order to accomplish a good result. Thomas moore said that the law was like the trees of a forest "would you be willing to chop down those trees in your efforts to apprehend the devil". The clerk replied in the affirmative, and sir Thomas Moore said "and when you finally came upon the devil and the devil turned upon you, behind which tree would you hide?"

A month ago the left celebrated the 'Battle of Cable street' in what was a pathetic communist event with UAF speakers and a Karl Marx reading evening. What they were celebrating was the passage of the public order act - a piece of law justified for it's use against fascists, yet has been the bane of the left. It is felt most by our baby students who even today feel the effects of the legislation; all protests especially the recent marches against the cuts are all proscribed by the police under the public order act. The Organisers have to get police permission to march, or they can't march at all, they are told what their route is, and even then half the met is mobilized against them and just treat them like an illegal march anyway, arresting anyone they feel like. These kids, payed up members of the political class, labour party supporters, the children of elites suffer the full treatment.

Fascists in the 1930's on the other hand, who obeyed the law and had special relations with the police remained unaffected apart from having to remove their uniforms (Even this stipulation was not always observed). It can be argued this even benefited the BUF (for internal political reasons) who were also never once prosecuted under this act. though we all follow the same law far right marches have not really been a phenomena since the 1970's during the early days of the National Front, the public order act does not affect a single British patriot.

Despite all this, the left see absolutely no contradiction in their support for draconian law and support for their own civil rights, to them it was 'worth it'.

It isn't just the left that does this. British Muslims too fought bitterly for the passing of the incitement to religious hatred bill, which was more or less handed to them by Blair as compensation for the war. They thought this would elevate them to Jew status in the eyes of the law, making it open season on islamaphobes. In reality more Muslims have been arrested under thie bill than any other group. The Pattern of irony just kills me.

It is not that these people are all inherently stupid, or that the results of these were unforeseen - it is in their ideological nature to expunge all counter revolutionaries; it is the view that makes a priority of killing all your ideological opponents over fighting the real enemy, it is purism and the ends justifying the means. How many times have you seen some shred sanity calling for caution written by some Civil liberties type, or some red from the guardian? all warning about the terrible consequences for the society of bringing in oppressive laws just for some moot point. it is wasted on the minds of the brainless. all you have to do is get them on their PC line and they all scream for blood. Just open a history book and look at the exceptional cruelty people are capable of when they hate.

Hate and violence is something our society is full of, yet it is always the weaker among us (particularly our own people on the far right) who are always advising against this being manifested in our own attitude, that such crudeness will alienate us, they don't understand how the hive mind works.

In the recent tram episode millions joined the twitter mob who demonstrating their liberal credentials by making demands that the offending woman should be sterilized and executed. Being shot seems to be what is trending the most. Even the Labour party leader Ed Miliband called on his supporters to ‘identify the woman shouting racist abuse on a tram in London'. Piers Morgan has suggested even deporting the "racist tram lady", - has Piers not considered though, that most of the population would like to see him deported out of a cannon into a brick wall?

The difference between us and them is they have no real enemy. People like the 'racist tram lady' was an ordinary person in the wrong place at the wrong time doing something she shouldn't. Our leaders though, the political class, and all the others - there is no word for these people other than that of pure and absolute evil, they are complete criminals against humanity. they DO deserve what WILL come to them.

All these weak minded and emotional people, along with their limp conservatives cohorts do not realise the manner in which they are digging their own graves. By their actions they are sewing the seeds for hysteria and hatred in society needed for the success of diametrically opposite social movement. The recent comedy program black mirror showed how twitter forced the prime minister of the united kingdom to have sex with a pig, it was a warning on the power of social communication in it's ability for unpredictability and evil, to unravel everything they built over the last fifty years. Already they are busy tearing down all the social and legal structures that would protect them - if the forces of law and order had to take power all the provisions to have the current government shot are already in existence, it is only a matter of time before people's movements begin to wield power, and with the hatred of the masses behind us it will be absolute slaughter.

Crime of the century

it happened people, racism has occurred. This thing has gone pretty much viral and left our nation in shock, we simply were not prepared.

This is literally the worst thing any individual can do, it is an act so evil that it occurs in a vacuum! A rapist or a murderer, or a paedophile not only has more rights than they deserve but their crimes are committed in a very complex sociological network. As a humanities and sociology student it was explained to me that even the most individual of human decisions are determined by an outlaying set of causal factors based on society's failings. Most forms of petty crime are you see, are directly correlated with relative deprivation which the individual becomes conscious of and revolt against. low life ghetto thugs understand concepts of class and universal processes of dialectical materialism - so their turning to crime is really the product of neglect and discrimination. Humanitarianists look with disgust at proponents of the death penalty and feel they take the moral high ground against barbaric treatments.

In this case though everyone has been thrown into temporary collective insanity The Daily Mail claims to be shocked and disgusted. Yes she should have been detained - for shouting and babbling on public transportation, but that will not be what she is charged for. In addition to the public lynching she will experience over the next few months, under the incitement to racial hatred act and god knows what else this woman will;
- Lose her job
- Go to prison
- Lose her child
If she is found guilty.

'Hate' - that word again, what does it mean? This goes against everything I was taught under the logic of Marxism; that Prejudice and bigotry is unnatural - after all if intolerance is the product of capitalism as a means to divide the working class is this woman not just as much a victim as the asylum seeker who steals to feed himself. What happened to what we were always taught 'you were not there' 'did you know their home life' 'what racism have they experienced' - The first defence is always that we cannot judge an event when it was not captured from the start. What happened to all these arguments? What do you think this woman felt; anger, sadness, desperation - are we to say that these were entirely irrational - she simply broke out in a rash of bigotry or could it be that something caused that?

See this comment and tell me if a part of you feels hate?
This is England being told.


Whatever you thought of this incident, if you are British and you felt something, then you are no better in the eyes of the powers that be than that woman. perhaps you now understand the great task they face - this is just a side effect of repression, one woman exploding. In the next decade we are going to see hundreds of these clips, there are already many like them; old people being taunted by a gang of youths with mobile phones, people like the woman on public transport with everyone around her speaking a foreign language. Every one of these I regard as a victory, because in my eyes it lays the blame squarely at the feet of those who were responsible. This is the sound of the multicult crashing down; it is going to start with things like this, and move up and up, and get worse! For once, I say that it should be the people in power who are made to answer for the mess they have created on the day of the rope.

Commoner Kate Attends Remembrance Ceremony

Relating article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060993/Regal-Duchess-Cambridge-attends-Remembrance-Sunday-ceremony-member-monarchy.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The Daily Mail today took it upon themselves to publish an article detailing the garments worn by the Duchess of Cambridge at the Remembrance Day ceremony.

I've never identified closely to the Royal family. For a long time I never took much more than a passing interest in the affairs of the Royals - and I find that many others share the same disinterest. The Royalists of our time tend to be  female, and either high society socialites or nouveau riche wannabes. But this article immediately drew my attention and for no good reason.

We've long been aware of how the cult of celebrity that now reigns supreme over popular cultural life - the media has replaced heroic idols with reality TV personalities, like our friends off Big Brother - the host of the Weakest Link(if she is still around) - or the bloke that does the weather forecast. People through a process of conditioning and the resulting total saturation in a fairytale, liberal utopian world; filled with STDs, aborted foetuses and paedophiles aplenty. What I had never noticed before is how deeply ingrained, that staunch bastion of traditional British virtue and manner, the Royal Family, has been in the whole charade propagated by the media outlets. They've been totally amalgamated into the whole showbiz, gossip column, bull-shit parade. The article is a stereotypical piece, the exemplification of the shit the press wheels out every day - "But there was plenty of room to make a fashion statement" - I mean, really, what the hell goes through a Woman's mind when you write that and why aren't the Royals kicking a shit-storm up about it? I know if someone wrote an article on what I was wearing at a sombre event like Armistice Sunday I would kick-off.

I know little, why people get such a buzz off reading about what frock Kate is wearing and what hat Camilla is wearing - why tabloids and broadsheets alike spend fuck loads on journalist parasites to spy on the movement of these pampered princesses' that have never done an honest days labour and never accomplished anything worthwhile. Indeed my greatest criticism of the monarchy and the rest of the aristocracy is that they serve no purpose other than to serve as trimmings at any major national occasion - Remembrance Day for instance.

I would have a more sympathetic view towards those who follow the monarchy - who seem to resemble toffs clinging forlornly to the last vestige of Britain's Imperial past - and the monarchy itself, if it at least embodied the values the values and virtues that made this country great: courage, honour, loyalty. The Royals show none of these; courage, they lacked when refusing to face up to the career politicians in Westminster began selling us out to the European Union and giving away our countries Common Wealth to the big-business monopolies. They lacked honour when Charles married Camila and turned the other cheek when our forces were sent into the third-world hell holes of Iraq and Afghanistan. They lacked loyalty to one another when they succumb to playing the media game. To cap it all of they've shown not just a deficit in the virtues necessary to rule and a failure to acknowledge age-old duty but they also seem to think themselves entitled to privilege and respect; riches and luxury - whilst contributing nothing to the national good, other than, more column inches in the tabloid press.

Get In There SON!

This leads to bigger questions over the role of the monarchy - it is tradition - something unique to the British political system - a 1000 year-old institution, in its current form. That is an Integral part of what I myself stand for and what Integralism stands for - tradition and heritage. But when you have Queen Elizabeth keeping schtum over the Great Betrayal to Brussels and Strasbourg. Prince Harry doing the business with any bird going - the Duke of Edinburgh making a general nuisance of himself. Coupled with the Royals' inability to perform a real constitutional function over than act as patron and figurehead - giving approval and legitimacy to treasonous policy.

There are many patriots out there who feel the Royal family to be nothing short of sacrosanct; this is a negative notion, and would be potentially harmful if that mindset was implemented when in power. When the monarchy as it stands has been debased by the media and lost the respect and inviolable position it once commanded. When we take power the Royal family will be given an ultimatum: either get your act together - restore your sense of honour, dignity and duty; restore the respect of the masses; restore respect for the ancient institutions. Otherwise, expect radical change in the constitutional framework of the UK - with the current Royal family replaced and regal status of the monarchy resumed by the introduction of new blood, as part of the renaissance of the British Nation.

Remember - this is a just soverign ruler - this the soverign ruler of yesteryear.

This article proves you are all racist

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2059238/Army-veteran-Mark-Mullins-wife-Helen-driven-suicide-poverty.html
And just before remembrance day - we can all sympathise with this on some level, maybe you remember youth and your single whitetrash debt ridden mother crying over spilt milk and electricity bills - and how helpless you feel to do anything about it. The timing is something, really it is why this can qualify as an article in today's media - the numbers of ex serviceman who have gone street could not be covered individually in this way as it would expose what is actually a national problem. A paper like the Mail is in a difficult position; it's readers want people like this to be properly cared for, but with out current government could not enact any form of welfare policy without that policy primarily being abused by the most unwanted and parasitical sections of society (like any other welfare policy) - therefore it cannot be mentioned because it would face people with the obvious solution of accepting discrimination or accepting this shit. They cannot do this, god knows they tried that shit in the 1930's and they know never to pull it ever again. Liberals hate the Daily Mail because it is some kind of real life hate machine - but they are more reserved than you might think, some editor has decided for complicated reasons that a story like this can only be raised in context - that means pussyfooting around the issue.

How much do you think it would have cost to save this stranded pathetic couple? in terms of what we spend currently on other social programmes, just a thought..

NEVER MIND, fuck them, what do they know about problems? this is what most people I know think is important, and dammit I am with them!
YES! there is not enough money going into the education system. Hahaha jokes on the government! now less people will want to go to university - and that is a bad thing! If they don't bring the fees down then ..? that negatively impacts Britain somehow.

Actually it is ironic as most of these people are represented and led by the National Union of Students to whom every single university is a compulsory member. This body is allocated a compulsory budget running in the millions of pounds to publish thousands of copies of it's own free newspaper, run fraudulent elections, employ several full time staff, and an additional budget for whatever the elections promise. Since I Joined; 1 million for a new night club, I million refurnishing a bar, 1 million turning a posh bar into some hi-tech Asian fusion gook food place - oh and tuition fees trebled . The university itself has also been a building site for the past three years; workman a full half mile around the complex digging up roads, clearing Forest, laying foundations, building huge subterranean complexes and an overground institutes where a lake used to be - and .... somebody needs to pay for it.

While cuts are made to the Navy, Airforce, Army (thousands of essential skilled personnel on the dole - costing more on the welfare system), and less help for ordinary families that are struggling.

Look, just fuck off OK waste is just a natural thing - you people - you right wing assholes are so whiny and cynical, but there are people who need our help more than Mr and Ms 'whiter than white' Mullins like developing countries in Africa. Africa is really this shit place, the television and news media showed me loads and is therefore my concern, so despite whatever alleged problems we have a moral duty to increase out foreign aid to 12billion.

David Cameron explains:

"They see us make painful cuts to budgets at home and wonder why we are increasing our spending abroad.

And they look at where some of our aid money has gone in recent years – on the wrong priorities and into the wrong hands – and think: this is all being wasted.

They have a point. Some of our money has been wasted. But that’s not an argument to stop aid. It’s an argument to change the way aid is delivered and that’s what we’re doing.

It is right for the British Prime Minister to be out there with British businesses trying to drum up exports and growth for our economy.

It is what I have done in India, China and now Africa

it was a great honour to be in the country to toast the former anti-apartheid leader .. who is an inspiration to the world"

See, you people have no idea what you are talking about. Fascism is a morally bankrupt evil ideology based on a hatred for humanist values. We have worked so hard since those times to make things FAIR and EQUAL - god - you people are so stupid. Yes, all of you, I only started this blog to prove how ignorant and hateful you all are. If you got mad at this then it reveals your lack of belief in the current system, our democratic instututions and our super smart leaders to make Britain a more hate free society. You should all feel immense SHAME.

Tony Blair hails his multicultural Britain

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2054903/Tony-Blair-defends-opening-door-mass-migration.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

>Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.

>The former prime minister said it was 'right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

>Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain 'stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.

>His comments come just days after official figures revealed that the population is expected to soar by the equivalent of a city the size of Leeds every year for the next decade.

>A defiant Mr Blair insisted his party’s policy on immigration was the right one. He said: 'It’s been a very positive thing and there is no way for a country like Britain to succeed in the future unless it is open to people of different colours, faiths and cultures.’

Douglas Holmes was right when he wrote that when Tony Blair speaks he alienates the part of the population that does not accord with his world embracing vision. Tony Blair is a really evil bastard, not like his cowardly colleagues who whine about him in the new statesman behind his back, he is a real warrior of the faith. In Alastair Campbell's 'the Blair years', an autobiographical work reputed to be the book most left in hotel rooms, he claimed that Blair based his all his actions an legal morals on a sect of Christianity which believes in what we would recognise as a form of absolute humanism - That all humans are naturally good and therefore the same and that the only legitimate human was one with humanist values. It was Tony Blair who wept in the oval office telling Clinton that he was abandoning his christian moral duty by not invading Serbia, It was Tony Blair who would take a vicarish tone whenever he spoke to the public on any issue, right up the the Iraq war and the Last days he said it was a human rights mission of which he was deeply proud. any and all issues, that extreme form of moral superiority and self righteousness. He left office to work for the UN as peace envoy to the Middle east and has made himself incredibly wealth doing it, he has earned £15 million a year and built a great property empire.

I wonder what his opinion would be if he had to live on minimum wage of the council estates across Britain that have been made a hell on hearth because of his devastating policies. In The above speech Tony Blair who let in 3 million immigrants, confirms what we knew in this classic article - that alleged the labour Immigration policy was a deliberate attempt to create a client base of future dependants=voters. I have highlighted the above quites; what does 'success' 'stronger' 'succeed' mean? what is the economic value of having a society that is more tolerant and diverse? - He isn't talking about economics you dummies, he is talking about the fact that the reason this was needed is to remould the country into his vision of a modern nation. Yes, you were lied to, shock and horror.

Britain is a country that is supposed to be grateful for it's freedom. in programmes we mock 20th century totalitarian regimes for their state sponsored buildings and social programmes - Freedom therefore clearly means the freedom of a political class to impose its will though the clenched teeth of the masses, just as tolerance is a virtue in and of itself with no regard to the evil that is tolerated.

Tony Blair has said loud and clear to the world that he did this because he hates this country, and he hates it's people; he wants to make it progressive and a model of his fellow politicians the world over 'Look at what i have done, how I have destroyed a people and created the new humanity representing the new individualist here in Britain!'. That he is so open about it shows his utter contempt for public opinion. You would think with people like Blair who would need fascists like us - he has made himself a figure of hatred in his own third world safe seats.

But nobody cares. This story wasn't even front page news, it is already in the memory hole. People will moan about how their lives are getting worse, but they will still vote like they do. what is required is a moral shock - a reaction against this that has a profound affect on the people. How can it be that this traitorous piece of filth can insult us in this way after such an injury, and continue to go unpunished?

This news came out on the same day an illegal immigrant strangled a man to death in the hospital bed next to him. it is no secret that the immigrants hate him and us indistinguishably. To Them, Blair it a war criminal and a christian terrorist - with things the way they are I am not holding out he will last forever, it is just a case of whether they get to him first.

I am the 99%

>> I was forced to study a useless degree that did not have any real world application. This wasn’t a smart career move. The solution is for the government to reimburse me.

>> I am the 99%



>>I live in a world that doesn’t value fine arts degrees, it is worse than living in Nazi Germany. I should not be punished for trying to break the mould.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was fired from my job because I have issues with authority. My internet start up failed because I lack any business sense. None of this is my own fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am very angry that the government have nothing better to do than answer my emails during the worst economic crisis of recent times. I don't have problems and don’t need to work for a living as this takes up all my time.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am an attention whore. Look at my calligraphy. We are all in this thing together yeah?

>>I am the 99%




>>I am a lawyer, but I'm not very good as I can't get any clients who can actually afford to pay me.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was once rich but lost it all due to my own stupidity and greed. I am forced to be a rent boy because I can’t do menial work.

>>I am the 99%



>>This is a copy of my résumé. I don’t know why I don’t have a job.

>>I am the 99%



>>Woe is me. I took out a six digit loan for an education I did not bother to pass. I stayed out partying too long and collapsed from heat stroke. You should pay for this even though it was my own stupid fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I don’t have problems but I am going to college and I don’t know how that will earn me money.
It is my opinion that education should be free no matter what I choose to learn whether it might benefit society or not.

>>I am the 99%


>>I am solidly middle class, I have two masters degrees I don’t have to pay for. I was able to buy my own house and this is the reason I cannot afford to get pregnant. I need more money.

>>I am the 99%




>I made frivolous purchases without a care for tomorrow, I made no plans for my future, I knocked up a girl and now it’s all catching up with me; I want the government to take make all my problems go away.

>I am the 99%



>>I am a junkie whore, I want you to pay me for advanced education as it is my human right.

>> I am the 99%



>>I am a Trans... WHAAAAAAAAT?!
.. Are you fucking serious?



.. look, If you are not going to make the effort




If you are like me you have been paying with some dismissive attention to this 'occupy wall street' protest in New York, it is of course just co opted crap - totally fake garbage performance by the Education industry and its student minions. That is fake, but people - they are real, and they do interest me. One for the side effects of the protest has been a mass outpouring of emotion on the internet 'I am the 99%' which has been dubbed 'the human face of the protest'. To me it is a window into the soul of post industrial decay - these ugly people and their ugly opinions exposes all the fatal flaws in our corrupt moral system of ethics and values more than it exposes our financial mess.

This idea of human rights and entitlement: Everyone has to be equal, everyone has to have a life, everyone has to have a degree in media studies, everyone has to have a blackberry messenger and a flat in town, and become a pop star - none of them ever question the whys and the wherefores. They have been pumped full of expectations and that sense of entitlement that have been put there by liberalism - Put there to fill the hole left by the destruction of our national culture, family, rights, duties, ect. Our reward for winning the war – to take any amount of shit to replace it with the weakness and dependence on the things liberalism was supposed to bring everyone. Don’t kid yourself, they are an endemic part of the problem.

I don't pity these people at all, they are scum. I had a friend from school that epitomised their condition; His thing was he really wanted to be something; he wanted to be a comedian and film director or some shit, but as an individual he was too weak. The interesting thing happened: When it was clear he was beginning to fail, when the realities of life started catch up with him, when he really needed some courage - instead of accepting the reality of the situation and facing up to it (Which would have then ultimately involved making just a few small changes to his life) he just collapsed into nothing instead. He began to cry, claimed he had a mental disability, faked illnesses and addictions, formed a victim ideology(anarchy), sought out a victim culture(drugs) - and believing in it all 100%. The more things got worse the deeper and deeper into this delusional sense of entitlement. When the state refused to accept he had a medical condition of any kind, he continued to stay on the dole - all the while blaming everything but himself and finding any excuse to not face up to anything.

This is the condition of the leftist movement, it is an identity fetish based on victimhood: If the 20th century was the century of the self, then the early 21st century is the century of the victim. On display is the lowest form of degeneracy and egoism. These people might play themselves the world’s largest violin - but they are the cause of their own problems - As well as my friend, I can't help but making comparisons to the student G20 protest in London which is exactly the same; a protest for more of what we already have; That feeling when tuition fees triple in the space of a year and they scream - FREE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE ... To perpetuate the continued destruction by the junk capitalist system, the destruction of the city centres, massive government spending to create sub cultural zones. This temporising brainwashing communist shit has been instilled into the population by capital for the ultimate and continued benefit of capital - to keep people weak and stupid. All this protesting is an emotional charade, it is masturbation - it is a constant lie so it never has to admit its own failure. Even the actual demands of the protestors which include amnesty for illegal immigrants, bigger union powers, Equality legislation, open borders - policies like this are the reason for the declining standard of life and economic collapse. All the Government projects and easy credit that finance their exorbitant lifestyles are what have directly led to this financial meltdown. Think of these people as the last gasp of capitalism.

The way I see it is this - yes things are bad and they are going to get worse. The solution to the problem, like any other problem - is to be proactive and face up to the challenge - to strive and to struggle until victory or death, that is the fascist way!
Just standing around waving signs is embarrassing - it doesn't mean anything unless the people who wave those signs have the power to act. People posting pictures on the internet doesn't mean anything either unless those people are feared. Take responsibility, take control of own destiny, Through your actions you redeem yourself.

Rejected from art school
Not qualified for architecture school
Orphaned at 18
Homeless at 21
I slept on a park bench and dreamed of the world

I am the 99%

The goal of education is to destroy you

Liberals celebrate themselves endlessly for all the so called civil rights and progress they have given us, it is like being invited to your own funeral by your murderers so you can thank them in person. They really like to rub everyones noses in it with all these anniversary events, history months, monuments, television specials and so on. They act like it was the most significant thing that ever occurred and young people today are taught to idolise the struggle of the 60's-80's for the institutionalisation of the equality movement and prize its dead culture; its films, its music, literature, and so forth are embedded into both the media and the curriculum as the pinnacle of human development. the primary concern of these people is that when we move into modernity people will stop caring about their struggle and we could lapse into something horrible.

The reality is that the achievement of the civil rights movement has been to steadily erode and utterly destroy the the quality and meaning of human life. The entire history of the civil rights movement as a process has been the dismantling of the rights and privileges of the majority population under the guise of 'equality', the 'giving of rights to others' - If you have awarded a minority with the sacred and legal right to be equal in a given field without affecting them in any way - must necessitate a penalty on the majority group. the more minority groups and fields you add the more of the population is debased to the lowest common denominator.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043567/Schools-judged-gay-gipsy-pupils-progress.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8786641/Dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html

>Schools will be penalised if they fail to improve the progress of ‘vulnerable’ groups of pupils such as those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual. New Ofsted guidelines reveal that heads of primary and secondary schools must show their education ‘meets the needs of the range of pupils’ in their classrooms, including gipsy and traveller children.
>Schools could see their teaching being judged ‘inadequate’ if they do not reduce gaps in achievement between different groups who make up a significant proportion of their student population.
>Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in "the full range of flesh tones", reflecting the diversity of the human race
>The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two. According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them "unlearn".
>People who are feeling defensive can say 'well there’s nothing wrong with white paper’, but in reality there could be if you don’t see yourself reflected in the things around you,” she said.
>“People might criticise this as political correctness gone mad. But it is because of political correctness we have moved on enormously. If you think that we now take it for granted that our buildings and public highways are adapted so people in wheelchairs and with pushchairs can move around. Years ago if you were in a wheelchair, then tough luck. We have completely moved and we wouldn’t have done that without the equality movement.”

The Equality movement... let that sink in. Equality is a dishonest term in that it is a codeword for anti-life, so far as the word 'life' has meaning in the survival sense. To make children equal, you must rob the entire youth of the challenges and experiences that make life bearable, so all kids can be the same as the drooling retard. Some people cannot be raised up from the bottom, because their constitution is simply inferior - the egalitarian insistence that all people are equal and their culture equally valid results in a failure to acknowledge this possibility and prevents any treatment of the cause. If you really wanted to raise the standards of children from 'disadvantaged communities' you would address the core social issue which would be to take them out of these communities and re socialise them while they are young, - you also get rid of all the negative cultural influences that affect them; the television, their music, anything that carries their culture, you get rid of it and instill in them the superior values of the majority group. Because that is not an option and therefore raising the standards of these people is impossible - the solution will more often than not to destroy the standards of education to a mind numbing dross, and the HAVE to do this, it is legislated and teachers on the front line have to meet their equality targets. They will also face the similar problem of addressing the equality issues of an imagined group such as aforementioned transsexual children. I mean, what the actual fuck are you supposed to do with that? A significant part of promoting equality is 'educating' young in cultural marxism at the expense of endless time that could have been spent educating children about practical life skills.

Looking back on my own experience it was difficult even then to get anything done - I really made the effort to try and challenge myself with something that resembled a protestant ethic, even for the things that didn't count; behaving well, dressing and speaking properly, but absolutely nobody gave a shit, and I feel my attitude actually resulted in me being penalised by some of the trotskyite teachers who made assumptions about my background. All the wealth and class issues leftists bang on about has nothing to do with it, We didn't have any money, any text books, television, computers, none of that - but we still tried - but what is the point of trying today? liberals don't know what they are doing, they hope they are going to create a generations of left wing hedonists , they are totally wrong it is economically and socially unsustainable. From primary education to university it is prizes for all, half the adult population doing temporised debased degrees that are worthless in the real world, - their hope is by this point you are so indoctrinated into the systems way of thinking that you don't realise you have been conned out of an existence. That is what all the liberal self celebration is for, it is the great social lie that is marching us to social oblivion - and therefore the promise of starting again.

The more the system does this the more that people will realise they face a very real choice between Integralism=Life and communism=death. Already this hopelessly flawed system is robbing the population of its idealism. it has already left a generation of young people with a bitter superiority complex - those who were intelligent and knew they could have done well, but realise now that their future and history has been sold out after they were mislead by false heroes and role models to maintain the wrong aspirations. You have the great social problem of enforced nihilism - to make people equal has meant that we have lost our national culture - the very thing that used to make like bearable, that got people up in the morning; anything that gave people pride and a sense of responsibility has been robbed from millions of our people, leaving a very big hole - right went hey all need it the most in face of the lofty and unattainable standards promoted by liberalism. Desperate, Betrayed, weakened, fearful - It invites trouble for the future from those offering a cure to the current mess.

Yuri Bezmenov - how to subvert a society

KGB defector who changed his name to Tomas Schuman on how to demoralise a society. His work has been widely stolen from by far right commentators, (programmes like follow the white rabbit) and this is the origin of the termiology. As an adversary the extent of his work was not to introduce into america something alien but to promote existing tendencies and attitudes in society that are already destroying it. There is apparantly reason behind it; it is questionable why american security interests (Security being the only section that functions properly) invest so much in countering internet censorship in china and 'democracy movements' in the middle east.

The point is you have a direct correlation between the dominant political attitudes in the west - and exactly what someone would do if they wanted to actually destroy a nation.

Yuri says their goal is to undermine/break up the following.

Ideas:
Religion - politicise, commercialise - postmodernism: 'supermarket of faith'
Education - promote moral relativity and permissiveness
Media - monopolise it, make it irrelevant and narrative driven, create a myopia of uninformed opinion
Culture - False heroes and role models, consumerism, fads.

Structures:
Law and order - Is 'legislative' not moral
Social relations - Rights vs. obligations, replacement of community with bureaucracy, social workers ect.
Security - denigrate the image of Police, Military, intelligence as dangerous. glamorise/portray sympathetically; outlaws, criminals, the enemy, spies, etc.
Internal politics - politics/Political party non issues = antagonisms - divide society against itself.
Foreign relations - enemies as 'friends', stunts, world community.

Life:
Family - Break up, create dependency on welfare.
Health - sports as supplement, junk food, - enfeeble the masses
Race - Run ethnic conflict, promote entitlement of minority group/oppression complex
Population - Urbanise the population, 'urban culture' to alienate them from the historical national life
Labour - Unions vs society. Promote entitlement and victimisation

I think an important part of argument is having a consistant message. Here you have all of these individual things that relate to the wider issue of national survival. To oppose the processes that are aimed against you requires that you should expose the destructive tendency for what it is. Liberals will say things like 'racist' if they want to discredit you, because if you promote group identity exclusion is a possibility = RACISM! - you must make people understand it is the same of liberalism, that it is their destruction and that the choice in this world is between Communism and Fascism/ death and Life.

Ruling party conference

Relevant stories http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14985706
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2039821/We-let-rioters-Clegg-tell-party-looters-fell-cracks-years-ago.html

The Liberal Democrats are having a party conference where they intend to make very bold centrist statements. Nick clegg affirmed his party's commitment to Liberal social policies and moderate public spending! .. I know, he is very brave, especially with all of the opposition he will face.

This is how stupid the press thinks you are, even though they believe their own lies, they actually spin this as interparty drama - making out that the parties dislike each other and are at war all off all the time. High politics this is!

Both arms of the money power's liberal press realise they require conflict to prop each other up. By creating superficial attacks on elements of conservatism the right wing press much keep people's faith in it's political party - despite every day complaining about things like this whilst conveniently forgetting the responsibility of the current government. It is more than convenience. Likewise the left wing maintains the theatrics of petty self satisfied egalitarian jeering, standing for principles and giving one to David - while in reality they need the Tories to stay large so the party can sustain a liberal elite and take on its own back benchers. Though I should add this section of the press is printed exclusively for smug self satisfied trendy arseholes and neckbearded politics faggots who love the smell of their own farts, it is the extent of the other side.

The social tensions behind this summer’s rioting must not be ignored, Nick Clegg will warn today.

The Deputy Prime Minister will use his flagship conference speech to insist many of the looters had ‘lost touch with their own future’ because they had been let down by society.

Mr Clegg will also announce a £50million scheme to offer 100,000 disadvantaged children two weeks of summer school at the age of 11 to help them to ‘catch up and get ready for the challenges ahead’.

But it is the Lib Dem leader’s language on the riots that will cause most controversy.

He will try to rally traditional supporters by distancing himself from the Conservatives over law and order.

Are these not the policies that David Cameron endorses? this is a warning to us that we need to test our tolerance over the coming months.

Politics is generally speaking a bad thing. Liberals use it well, they have all these narratives to prop up the illusion of a multi party system, and diffuse dissent by confusing the British people and getting them to fight amongst themselves. The parties are all the same, it is the same political elite, the same followers, all trying to kill us! - all committed to the same aims and goals heading towards our destruction.

The same can not be said for us, we seem to achive the opposite effect of remaining inconsistant defensive, and confused. We have to learn to attack, to take an offensive position in exposing the contradictions of fake politics, get people to realise it is not this party and that party, but us and them. If you get people to hate politicians, make them realise they have been conned, they will hate. People have short memories as these article proves, remind them of the things they have done to us - make them aware that they are part of a national group that is under attack. Abandon politics, that is not what is imporant, you have to get the nation to see the anti nation and set it on a colission course. Do your part to expose political theatre and help bring about it's destruction.

Is your Baby racist?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2037050/Racists-aged-THREE-Children-accused-bigotry-broccoli-head-calling.html#ixzz1Y9ADlgH1

> Teachers are branding thousands of children racist or homophobic following playground squabbles. More than 20,000 pupils aged 11 or younger were last year put on record for so-called hate crimes such as using the word ‘gaylord’. Some of them are even from nursery schools where children are no older than three.
> One youngster was accused of being racist for calling a boy ‘broccoli head’ and another was said to be homophobic for telling a teacher ‘this work is gay’. Two primary school children were reported for homophobia after quarrelling over a rubber and calling each other ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’.
>Schools are forced to report the language to education authorities, which keep a register of incidents.Although the Department for Education recently pledged to cut unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy, it has given no guidance on such ‘offences’. In total, 34,000 nursery, primary and secondary pupils were effectively classed as bigots because of anti-bullying rules.
> The school can keep the pupil’s name and ‘crime’ on file. The record can be passed from primaries to secondaries or when a pupil moves between schools. And if schools are asked for a pupil reference by a future employer or a university, the record could be used as the basis for it, meaning the pettiest of incidents has the potential to blight a child for life.
> The figures show 34,000 racist incidents reported by schools to local education authorities in England and Wales. Of these, 20,000 were at primary schools.
> Schools were required by the Labour government in 2002 to monitor and report all racist incidents to their local authority. Teachers must name the alleged perpetrator and victim and spell out the incident and the punishment. Local authority records show the type of incident but not the name of the child involved.

This may shock you, even frighten you a little. You may think how you can even comment on a story like this, because of how serious this is. the truth is it IS very serious, but this is the state of things all the time, Things are always in black and white. All I see here is allegedly hamless ideas that nobody blinks an eye to being taken to a logical conclusion; A list is how a totalitarian system functions if it wants to ensure its survival, the weaklings and the ones that think improperly you need to collect and do something about them otherwise they cause you problems. From a liberal perspective it could be seen as incredibly humane, a good start in life to correct the moral thinking of a toddler who would otherwise nurture his bad thoughts and grow up to do something worse. Why not?

As a system for streaming the potentially 'bigoted' it is horribly inefficient and pointless - I mean they are kids right? the 'treatment' is basically random and arbitrary. I mean, how are they supposed to get their heads around the semiotics of a cultural Marxist social construct to accept it in the affirmative or negative? They wouldn't have got me, that's for sure! outwardly I ate up so much of that garbage they fed me in the humanities classes that I could have been a professor of discrimination studies. I remember having one unrecorded incident aged 11 when I might have said something I shouldn't, I but instantly realising what I said I froze completely and began begging forgiveness, pity was taken upon me.

So I like it when our people get upset by something, It is good! They are realising they have been conned - That will make them angry - then will come action! it shows people the destructive and ruthless nature of what we have, and that ultimately it is a choice between Cultural Communism or Cultural Fascism and time is running short.

A Liberal I knew said he didn't care about stories like these other than framing them negatively was a bad thing, it is something we should embrace because it keeps us from the alternative - Fascism, back to the 1950's, etc. If pissing off a few moaning (but otherwise harmless) mail readers All the better!

My advice is don't get mad, do something about it. What are you upset about? A list? We can make a list as well you numpkin! A list is just a list, some people will fear just being on any kind of list, but really it isn't what matters - what matters is that unlike this pathetic piece of government legislation ours would have a legitimate Iron Fist behind it - the infinite scorn of the people and their will to hand out their own form of justice.

All the teachers, the school officials, the 'community leaders', the bureaucrats, the politicians - Everybody who was part of this attempt to destroy us, everybody who is part of the anti-nation - They get their own list as well; Their names and addresses along with their crimes and we will act on them.

Never despair. there is plently of time to see justice done.

Why I hate...

U mad? hate is a very powerful emotion.

Personally, I cannot descibe how angry things like this make me, and it is made all the worse that you have to ignore it - you are supposed to pretend everything is alwayswonderful and we live in some peaceful communist fagfuck utopia. 'problems in society?' are only the indirect cause of intollerance in society. All year round from age one you are have this false ideology shoved down your throat, even from preschool. You can't have an opinion on it, You can't discuss it, you can't vote on it, etcetera etcetera.

Despite this I have never met a true humanist. In regards to the holocaust, starving Africans, all the causes we are supposed to care about I have never seen anyone actually give an actual fuck, though they might pretend to - it is only because they wish it meant something to them.

Even liberals I know cannot explain why it is they sponsor Africans, to me it just doesn't make sense how you can be so connected to something without any real information or knowledge on the subject - It is obvious for what it is a selfish charade to validate their existence. Humanism is unhuman, it is not based on reality, it is a suicidal attitude of warmness to everything whilst simultaneously knowing nothing about it - make belief for adults who see the world in happy rainbows. this is why they so vigorously suppress the truth, they fear it.

I do not think it is possible to ever know the suffering of some great 'tragedy', to presume you have that kind of connection is more than arrogant. On the other hand the only time I have ever seen friends and family get angry is over is over stuff like this. Otto Strasser said that Hate must be born of love - we hate because it is based on something that is real, because we think collectively in the very real sense. Nationalism is the only socialism. When you see your country attacked, or something that is sacred to you, The pain you feel is not a self entitled ago trip it hits you personally - It is an attack on your borders, your identity, your survival, your sense of security. It makes sense evolutionarily, it is a survival mechanism that is trying to tell your body that you need act!

This is worth baring in mind when your relative frowns at the cover of the Daily mail or some libtard tells you that everything about you is just a social construct.

UN says: Don't knock down illegal traveller site

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2033206/Anger-UN-says-Dont-knock-illegal-traveller-site-culturally-appropriate-home-found.html

>They have been desperately searching for supporters to help fight their eviction. So within minutes of discovering that no less than the United Nations was backing their cause yesterday, residents of Europe’s largest illegal traveller camp triumphantly raised the organisation’s blue flag in celebration. In an astonishing intervention, the UN condemned plans to bulldoze the Dale Farm camp and insisted that the eviction should be suspended to protect the travellers’ human rights. The demand came from the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which said bailiffs should be called off until travellers are found ‘culturally appropriate alternative accommodation’. It comes days after the High Court in Britain ruled that the camp in Crays Hill, Essex, should be demolished. The evictions of 80 families on 52 plots are set to begin within a fortnight.

If these people's rights to a culturally appropriate home is so important why doesn't the UN take them? The main flaw of liberal morality beside being narrative based is that the standard is always universal, No matter whether the originator of the legislation takes active responsibility, if affected by the issue, or fails to meet their own standard - it in no prevents the rest of us having to meet that goal. Rich humanitarian liberal professors will sit in their closed off offices and lecture halls deciding, judging, that what is needed is the most progressive thing because that is right - but carry on just as they do before yet find some way to make people feel guilty about it. I am reminded of that first great liberal essay written by Peter Singer in the 1970's that says every westerner is morally bound to give virtually everything, up to the clothing on their backs to help third world hunger - yet he himself has not quite done this as is the case with the many millions of libtarded scum who have since read that essay and agreed with him.

What about the rights of our people? how is the culture, well being and livelihood of the residents affected by the presence of this pikey camp. Do we all get 'culturally appropriate' housing. We have sod all, and we had to work for it as well, find our own way, make our own comfort.

I have a suggestion if they want to live somewhere that is culturally appropriate why not send them back to where their culture originated; Ireland?

"the battle will be long and let Libya burn."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_LIBYA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-09-01-10-34-43


>In Thursday's message, Gadhafi said the tribes in Sirte and Bani Walid are armed and "there is no way they will submit." He called for continued resistance, warning "the battle will be long and let Libya burn."

Ich frage euch: Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg? Wollt ihr ihn, wenn nötig, totaler und radikaler, als wir ihn uns heute überhaupt erst vorstellen können? Nun, Volk, steh auf und Sturm brich los!

When our politicians intervened, they did so on the naive premise that they are on the right side of history and should support democracy movements everywhere, even in countries with high standards of living, Jacobin democracy is always good and can make us more democratic beacuse we are all the same! They didn't understand what a civil war actually means and thought a few bombs would be all that was needed to encourage the populous to turn out in the streets demanding their 'freedoms'. they have nothing to complain about, Libya is the closest thing to a bloated welfare state as you can get in the middle east with the highest standard of living in the region.

Now half a year later humanitarian air strikes have toppled the regime from the capital and the rebels are claiming victory before it is all over - at this point NATO would like to exit fast as it has long overstretched its capacity for a limited war. Just they wait until the rebels start turning on each other, they already have. Despite media lies about the homogeneous peaceful democratic nature of the rebels you have all the factions: the deep tribal divisions, the radical Islamic element, the blacks, the opportunistic military commanders (and their personal armies) that have defected, and of course the portion of the country still under Gaddafi's Control (including the second capital Sirte) - In all that this unelected central government has to not only prevent another civil war but enforce the vision of our own politicians of a new peaceful Canada style alternative left social democracy on the whole country!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Al Qaeda are our good friends now we are sending them billions in aid and military assistance but wait till they find that their representatives sold them out to being western puppets. Whoever takes Libya will have to unite it somehow to maintain control - who is going to bet that it will be the intervening outsiders who all the blame will fall onto. Liberals think they are making the world better and that they should be thanked, but they live in a fantasy world - liberal rights and morals are a narrative based contructon. Everyone says they fight for human rights, Gadaffi before the conflict was a 'human rights champion', whom Nelson Mandella accepted awards from. Who is to say that we will always have the power to define morality in each theatre. Moreover what do all the proud and civilised edicts that make western politicians feel all progressive actually mean in the middle of a bloody war of dirt people.

Now that Gadaffi himself is out of the actual fighting and fortified deep inside the country he could wage quite an effective guerrilla campaign from there. At the beginning of the conflict when the rebels started advancing Gadaffi threatened to open up his weapon caches to the people and leave the place in total anarchy, and goodness knows what else he has. When he says Libya will burn. mabye he means it?

NATO doesn't have the stomach for this - not because it is expensive or because it contradicts their moral position (which will always be diseased), it is because they are weak minded and cannot take the moral responsibility of doing what needs to be done to strug
gle. The very politicians who led the call for bombing demanded out pilots apologise for 'civilian' deaths. In the 1920's a popular campaign against Italian occupation was launched, in response the Fascists used poison gas, concentration camps, hangings, mass rapes, destruction of mosques, mass killing - Everything that is needed to wage war for the destruction of the enemy, Libya was pacified in months. Extermination and Catastrophe is something we could achieve with almost no effort - We could do this with one bomber going its round dropping some nerve gas or Nuclear weapons in capital cities. We can't even put boots on the ground because Germaine Greer says a Libyan woman might get raped.

"Modern man is more of a moral coward. He wants the advantages of violent intolerance — which is only natural — but he shuns the responsibility of it." - Savitri Devi

All war is an atrocity - You have to embrace that. Let those who can fight, fight. Those without the will to overcome the thousands of resistances life brings are not worthy of life.