Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Crime of the century



it happened people, racism has occurred. This thing has gone pretty much viral and left our nation in shock, we simply were not prepared.

This is literally the worst thing any individual can do, it is an act so evil that it occurs in a vacuum! A rapist or a murderer, or a paedophile not only has more rights than they deserve but their crimes are committed in a very complex sociological network. As a humanities and sociology student it was explained to me that even the most individual of human decisions are determined by an outlaying set of causal factors based on society's failings. Most forms of petty crime are you see, are directly correlated with relative deprivation which the individual becomes conscious of and revolt against. low life ghetto thugs understand concepts of class and universal processes of dialectical materialism - so their turning to crime is really the product of neglect and discrimination. Humanitarianists look with disgust at proponents of the death penalty and feel they take the moral high ground against barbaric treatments.

In this case though everyone has been thrown into temporary collective insanity The Daily Mail claims to be shocked and disgusted. Yes she should have been detained - for shouting and babbling on public transportation, but that will not be what she is charged for. In addition to the public lynching she will experience over the next few months, under the incitement to racial hatred act and god knows what else this woman will;
- Lose her job
- Go to prison
- Lose her child
If she is found guilty.

'Hate' - that word again, what does it mean? This goes against everything I was taught under the logic of Marxism; that Prejudice and bigotry is unnatural - after all if intolerance is the product of capitalism as a means to divide the working class is this woman not just as much a victim as the asylum seeker who steals to feed himself. What happened to what we were always taught 'you were not there' 'did you know their home life' 'what racism have they experienced' - The first defence is always that we cannot judge an event when it was not captured from the start. What happened to all these arguments? What do you think this woman felt; anger, sadness, desperation - are we to say that these were entirely irrational - she simply broke out in a rash of bigotry or could it be that something caused that?

See this comment and tell me if a part of you feels hate?
This is England being told.


Whatever you thought of this incident, if you are British and you felt something, then you are no better in the eyes of the powers that be than that woman. perhaps you now understand the great task they face - this is just a side effect of repression, one woman exploding. In the next decade we are going to see hundreds of these clips, there are already many like them; old people being taunted by a gang of youths with mobile phones, people like the woman on public transport with everyone around her speaking a foreign language. Every one of these I regard as a victory, because in my eyes it lays the blame squarely at the feet of those who were responsible. This is the sound of the multicult crashing down; it is going to start with things like this, and move up and up, and get worse! For once, I say that it should be the people in power who are made to answer for the mess they have created on the day of the rope.

Sunday, 13 November 2011

Commoner Kate Attends Remembrance Ceremony


Relating article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060993/Regal-Duchess-Cambridge-attends-Remembrance-Sunday-ceremony-member-monarchy.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The Daily Mail today took it upon themselves to publish an article detailing the garments worn by the Duchess of Cambridge at the Remembrance Day ceremony.

I've never identified closely to the Royal family. For a long time I never took much more than a passing interest in the affairs of the Royals - and I find that many others share the same disinterest. The Royalists of our time tend to be  female, and either high society socialites or nouveau riche wannabes. But this article immediately drew my attention and for no good reason.

We've long been aware of how the cult of celebrity that now reigns supreme over popular cultural life - the media has replaced heroic idols with reality TV personalities, like our friends off Big Brother - the host of the Weakest Link(if she is still around) - or the bloke that does the weather forecast. People through a process of conditioning and the resulting total saturation in a fairytale, liberal utopian world; filled with STDs, aborted foetuses and paedophiles aplenty. What I had never noticed before is how deeply ingrained, that staunch bastion of traditional British virtue and manner, the Royal Family, has been in the whole charade propagated by the media outlets. They've been totally amalgamated into the whole showbiz, gossip column, bull-shit parade. The article is a stereotypical piece, the exemplification of the shit the press wheels out every day - "But there was plenty of room to make a fashion statement" - I mean, really, what the hell goes through a Woman's mind when you write that and why aren't the Royals kicking a shit-storm up about it? I know if someone wrote an article on what I was wearing at a sombre event like Armistice Sunday I would kick-off.

I know little, why people get such a buzz off reading about what frock Kate is wearing and what hat Camilla is wearing - why tabloids and broadsheets alike spend fuck loads on journalist parasites to spy on the movement of these pampered princesses' that have never done an honest days labour and never accomplished anything worthwhile. Indeed my greatest criticism of the monarchy and the rest of the aristocracy is that they serve no purpose other than to serve as trimmings at any major national occasion - Remembrance Day for instance.

I would have a more sympathetic view towards those who follow the monarchy - who seem to resemble toffs clinging forlornly to the last vestige of Britain's Imperial past - and the monarchy itself, if it at least embodied the values the values and virtues that made this country great: courage, honour, loyalty. The Royals show none of these; courage, they lacked when refusing to face up to the career politicians in Westminster began selling us out to the European Union and giving away our countries Common Wealth to the big-business monopolies. They lacked honour when Charles married Camila and turned the other cheek when our forces were sent into the third-world hell holes of Iraq and Afghanistan. They lacked loyalty to one another when they succumb to playing the media game. To cap it all of they've shown not just a deficit in the virtues necessary to rule and a failure to acknowledge age-old duty but they also seem to think themselves entitled to privilege and respect; riches and luxury - whilst contributing nothing to the national good, other than, more column inches in the tabloid press.

Get In There SON!
This leads to bigger questions over the role of the monarchy - it is tradition - something unique to the British political system - a 1000 year-old institution, in its current form. That is an Integral part of what I myself stand for and what Integralism stands for - tradition and heritage. But when you have Queen Elizabeth keeping schtum over the Great Betrayal to Brussels and Strasbourg. Prince Harry doing the business with any bird going - the Duke of Edinburgh making a general nuisance of himself. Coupled with the Royals' inability to perform a real constitutional function over than act as patron and figurehead - giving approval and legitimacy to treasonous policy.

There are many patriots out there who feel the Royal family to be nothing short of sacrosanct; this is a negative notion, and would be potentially harmful if that mindset was implemented when in power. When the monarchy as it stands has been debased by the media and lost the respect and inviolable position it once commanded. When we take power the Royal family will be given an ultimatum: either get your act together - restore your sense of honour, dignity and duty; restore the respect of the masses; restore respect for the ancient institutions. Otherwise, expect radical change in the constitutional framework of the UK - with the current Royal family replaced and regal status of the monarchy resumed by the introduction of new blood, as part of the renaissance of the British Nation.

Remember - this is a just soverign ruler - this the soverign ruler of yesteryear.







Wednesday, 9 November 2011

This article proves you are all racist

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2059238/Army-veteran-Mark-Mullins-wife-Helen-driven-suicide-poverty.html
And just before remembrance day - we can all sympathise with this on some level, maybe you remember youth and your single whitetrash debt ridden mother crying over spilt milk and electricity bills - and how helpless you feel to do anything about it. The timing is something, really it is why this can qualify as an article in today's media - the numbers of ex serviceman who have gone street could not be covered individually in this way as it would expose what is actually a national problem. A paper like the Mail is in a difficult position; it's readers want people like this to be properly cared for, but with out current government could not enact any form of welfare policy without that policy primarily being abused by the most unwanted and parasitical sections of society (like any other welfare policy) - therefore it cannot be mentioned because it would face people with the obvious solution of accepting discrimination or accepting this shit. They cannot do this, god knows they tried that shit in the 1930's and they know never to pull it ever again. Liberals hate the Daily Mail because it is some kind of real life hate machine - but they are more reserved than you might think, some editor has decided for complicated reasons that a story like this can only be raised in context - that means pussyfooting around the issue.

How much do you think it would have cost to save this stranded pathetic couple? in terms of what we spend currently on other social programmes, just a thought..

NEVER MIND, fuck them, what do they know about problems? this is what most people I know think is important, and dammit I am with them!
YES! there is not enough money going into the education system. Hahaha jokes on the government! now less people will want to go to university - and that is a bad thing! If they don't bring the fees down then ..? that negatively impacts Britain somehow.

Actually it is ironic as most of these people are represented and led by the National Union of Students to whom every single university is a compulsory member. This body is allocated a compulsory budget running in the millions of pounds to publish thousands of copies of it's own free newspaper, run fraudulent elections, employ several full time staff, and an additional budget for whatever the elections promise. Since I Joined; 1 million for a new night club, I million refurnishing a bar, 1 million turning a posh bar into some hi-tech Asian fusion gook food place - oh and tuition fees trebled . The university itself has also been a building site for the past three years; workman a full half mile around the complex digging up roads, clearing Forest, laying foundations, building huge subterranean complexes and an overground institutes where a lake used to be - and .... somebody needs to pay for it.

While cuts are made to the Navy, Airforce, Army (thousands of essential skilled personnel on the dole - costing more on the welfare system), and less help for ordinary families that are struggling.

Look, just fuck off OK waste is just a natural thing - you people - you right wing assholes are so whiny and cynical, but there are people who need our help more than Mr and Ms 'whiter than white' Mullins like developing countries in Africa. Africa is really this shit place, the television and news media showed me loads and is therefore my concern, so despite whatever alleged problems we have a moral duty to increase out foreign aid to 12billion.

David Cameron explains:

"They see us make painful cuts to budgets at home and wonder why we are increasing our spending abroad.

And they look at where some of our aid money has gone in recent years – on the wrong priorities and into the wrong hands – and think: this is all being wasted.

They have a point. Some of our money has been wasted. But that’s not an argument to stop aid. It’s an argument to change the way aid is delivered and that’s what we’re doing.

It is right for the British Prime Minister to be out there with British businesses trying to drum up exports and growth for our economy.

It is what I have done in India, China and now Africa

it was a great honour to be in the country to toast the former anti-apartheid leader .. who is an inspiration to the world"
See, you people have no idea what you are talking about. Fascism is a morally bankrupt evil ideology based on a hatred for humanist values. We have worked so hard since those times to make things FAIR and EQUAL - god - you people are so stupid. Yes, all of you, I only started this blog to prove how ignorant and hateful you all are. If you got mad at this then it reveals your lack of belief in the current system, our democratic instututions and our super smart leaders to make Britain a more hate free society. You should all feel immense SHAME.

Sunday, 30 October 2011

Tony Blair hails his multicultural Britain


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2054903/Tony-Blair-defends-opening-door-mass-migration.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

>Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.

>The former prime minister said it was 'right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

>Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain 'stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.

>His comments come just days after official figures revealed that the population is expected to soar by the equivalent of a city the size of Leeds every year for the next decade.

>A defiant Mr Blair insisted his party’s policy on immigration was the right one. He said: 'It’s been a very positive thing and there is no way for a country like Britain to succeed in the future unless it is open to people of different colours, faiths and cultures.’

Douglas Holmes was right when he wrote that when Tony Blair speaks he alienates the part of the population that does not accord with his world embracing vision. Tony Blair is a really evil bastard, not like his cowardly colleagues who whine about him in the new statesman behind his back, he is a real warrior of the faith. In Alastair Campbell's 'the Blair years', an autobiographical work reputed to be the book most left in hotel rooms, he claimed that Blair based his all his actions an legal morals on a sect of Christianity which believes in what we would recognise as a form of absolute humanism - That all humans are naturally good and therefore the same and that the only legitimate human was one with humanist values. It was Tony Blair who wept in the oval office telling Clinton that he was abandoning his christian moral duty by not invading Serbia, It was Tony Blair who would take a vicarish tone whenever he spoke to the public on any issue, right up the the Iraq war and the Last days he said it was a human rights mission of which he was deeply proud. any and all issues, that extreme form of moral superiority and self righteousness. He left office to work for the UN as peace envoy to the Middle east and has made himself incredibly wealth doing it, he has earned £15 million a year and built a great property empire.

I wonder what his opinion would be if he had to live on minimum wage of the council estates across Britain that have been made a hell on hearth because of his devastating policies. In The above speech Tony Blair who let in 3 million immigrants, confirms what we knew in this classic article - that alleged the labour Immigration policy was a deliberate attempt to create a client base of future dependants=voters. I have highlighted the above quites; what does 'success' 'stronger' 'succeed' mean? what is the economic value of having a society that is more tolerant and diverse? - He isn't talking about economics you dummies, he is talking about the fact that the reason this was needed is to remould the country into his vision of a modern nation. Yes, you were lied to, shock and horror.

Britain is a country that is supposed to be grateful for it's freedom. in programmes we mock 20th century totalitarian regimes for their state sponsored buildings and social programmes - Freedom therefore clearly means the freedom of a political class to impose its will though the clenched teeth of the masses, just as tolerance is a virtue in and of itself with no regard to the evil that is tolerated.

Tony Blair has said loud and clear to the world that he did this because he hates this country, and he hates it's people; he wants to make it progressive and a model of his fellow politicians the world over 'Look at what i have done, how I have destroyed a people and created the new humanity representing the new individualist here in Britain!'. That he is so open about it shows his utter contempt for public opinion. You would think with people like Blair who would need fascists like us - he has made himself a figure of hatred in his own third world safe seats.

But nobody cares. This story wasn't even front page news, it is already in the memory hole. People will moan about how their lives are getting worse, but they will still vote like they do. what is required is a moral shock - a reaction against this that has a profound affect on the people. How can it be that this traitorous piece of filth can insult us in this way after such an injury, and continue to go unpunished?

This news came out on the same day an illegal immigrant strangled a man to death in the hospital bed next to him. it is no secret that the immigrants hate him and us indistinguishably. To Them, Blair it a war criminal and a christian terrorist - with things the way they are I am not holding out he will last forever, it is just a case of whether they get to him first.

Sunday, 9 October 2011

I am the 99%



>> I was forced to study a useless degree that did not have any real world application. This wasn’t a smart career move. The solution is for the government to reimburse me.

>> I am the 99%



>>I live in a world that doesn’t value fine arts degrees, it is worse than living in Nazi Germany. I should not be punished for trying to break the mould.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was fired from my job because I have issues with authority. My internet start up failed because I lack any business sense. None of this is my own fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am very angry that the government have nothing better to do than answer my emails during the worst economic crisis of recent times. I don't have problems and don’t need to work for a living as this takes up all my time.

>>I am the 99%



>>I am an attention whore. Look at my calligraphy. We are all in this thing together yeah?

>>I am the 99%




>>I am a lawyer, but I'm not very good as I can't get any clients who can actually afford to pay me.

>>I am the 99%



>>I was once rich but lost it all due to my own stupidity and greed. I am forced to be a rent boy because I can’t do menial work.

>>I am the 99%



>>This is a copy of my résumé. I don’t know why I don’t have a job.

>>I am the 99%



>>Woe is me. I took out a six digit loan for an education I did not bother to pass. I stayed out partying too long and collapsed from heat stroke. You should pay for this even though it was my own stupid fault.

>>I am the 99%



>>I don’t have problems but I am going to college and I don’t know how that will earn me money.
It is my opinion that education should be free no matter what I choose to learn whether it might benefit society or not.

>>I am the 99%


>>I am solidly middle class, I have two masters degrees I don’t have to pay for. I was able to buy my own house and this is the reason I cannot afford to get pregnant. I need more money.

>>I am the 99%




>I made frivolous purchases without a care for tomorrow, I made no plans for my future, I knocked up a girl and now it’s all catching up with me; I want the government to take make all my problems go away.

>I am the 99%



>>I am a junkie whore, I want you to pay me for advanced education as it is my human right.

>> I am the 99%



>>I am a Trans... WHAAAAAAAAT?!
.. Are you fucking serious?



.. look, If you are not going to make the effort




If you are like me you have been paying with some dismissive attention to this 'occupy wall street' protest in New York, it is of course just co opted crap - totally fake garbage performance by the Education industry and its student minions. That is fake, but people - they are real, and they do interest me. One for the side effects of the protest has been a mass outpouring of emotion on the internet 'I am the 99%' which has been dubbed 'the human face of the protest'. To me it is a window into the soul of post industrial decay - these ugly people and their ugly opinions exposes all the fatal flaws in our corrupt moral system of ethics and values more than it exposes our financial mess.

This idea of human rights and entitlement: Everyone has to be equal, everyone has to have a life, everyone has to have a degree in media studies, everyone has to have a blackberry messenger and a flat in town, and become a pop star - none of them ever question the whys and the wherefores. They have been pumped full of expectations and that sense of entitlement that have been put there by liberalism - Put there to fill the hole left by the destruction of our national culture, family, rights, duties, ect. Our reward for winning the war – to take any amount of shit to replace it with the weakness and dependence on the things liberalism was supposed to bring everyone. Don’t kid yourself, they are an endemic part of the problem.

I don't pity these people at all, they are scum. I had a friend from school that epitomised their condition; His thing was he really wanted to be something; he wanted to be a comedian and film director or some shit, but as an individual he was too weak. The interesting thing happened: When it was clear he was beginning to fail, when the realities of life started catch up with him, when he really needed some courage - instead of accepting the reality of the situation and facing up to it (Which would have then ultimately involved making just a few small changes to his life) he just collapsed into nothing instead. He began to cry, claimed he had a mental disability, faked illnesses and addictions, formed a victim ideology(anarchy), sought out a victim culture(drugs) - and believing in it all 100%. The more things got worse the deeper and deeper into this delusional sense of entitlement. When the state refused to accept he had a medical condition of any kind, he continued to stay on the dole - all the while blaming everything but himself and finding any excuse to not face up to anything.

This is the condition of the leftist movement, it is an identity fetish based on victimhood: If the 20th century was the century of the self, then the early 21st century is the century of the victim. On display is the lowest form of degeneracy and egoism. These people might play themselves the world’s largest violin - but they are the cause of their own problems - As well as my friend, I can't help but making comparisons to the student G20 protest in London which is exactly the same; a protest for more of what we already have; That feeling when tuition fees triple in the space of a year and they scream - FREE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE ... To perpetuate the continued destruction by the junk capitalist system, the destruction of the city centres, massive government spending to create sub cultural zones. This temporising brainwashing communist shit has been instilled into the population by capital for the ultimate and continued benefit of capital - to keep people weak and stupid. All this protesting is an emotional charade, it is masturbation - it is a constant lie so it never has to admit its own failure. Even the actual demands of the protestors which include amnesty for illegal immigrants, bigger union powers, Equality legislation, open borders - policies like this are the reason for the declining standard of life and economic collapse. All the Government projects and easy credit that finance their exorbitant lifestyles are what have directly led to this financial meltdown. Think of these people as the last gasp of capitalism.

The way I see it is this - yes things are bad and they are going to get worse. The solution to the problem, like any other problem - is to be proactive and face up to the challenge - to strive and to struggle until victory or death, that is the fascist way!
Just standing around waving signs is embarrassing - it doesn't mean anything unless the people who wave those signs have the power to act. People posting pictures on the internet doesn't mean anything either unless those people are feared. Take responsibility, take control of own destiny, Through your actions you redeem yourself.

Rejected from art school
Not qualified for architecture school
Orphaned at 18
Homeless at 21
I slept on a park bench and dreamed of the world

I am the 99%

Friday, 30 September 2011

The goal of education is to destroy you

Liberals celebrate themselves endlessly for all the so called civil rights and progress they have given us, it is like being invited to your own funeral by your murderers so you can thank them in person. They really like to rub everyones noses in it with all these anniversary events, history months, monuments, television specials and so on. They act like it was the most significant thing that ever occurred and young people today are taught to idolise the struggle of the 60's-80's for the institutionalisation of the equality movement and prize its dead culture; its films, its music, literature, and so forth are embedded into both the media and the curriculum as the pinnacle of human development. the primary concern of these people is that when we move into modernity people will stop caring about their struggle and we could lapse into something horrible.

The reality is that the achievement of the civil rights movement has been to steadily erode and utterly destroy the the quality and meaning of human life. The entire history of the civil rights movement as a process has been the dismantling of the rights and privileges of the majority population under the guise of 'equality', the 'giving of rights to others' - If you have awarded a minority with the sacred and legal right to be equal in a given field without affecting them in any way - must necessitate a penalty on the majority group. the more minority groups and fields you add the more of the population is debased to the lowest common denominator.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043567/Schools-judged-gay-gipsy-pupils-progress.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8786641/Dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html

>Schools will be penalised if they fail to improve the progress ofvulnerable’ groups of pupils such as those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual. New Ofsted guidelines reveal that heads of primary and secondary schools must show their education ‘meets the needs of the range of pupils’ in their classrooms, including gipsy and traveller children.
>Schools could see their teaching being judged ‘inadequate’ if they do not reduce gaps in achievement between different groups who make up a significant proportion of their student population.
>Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in "the full range of flesh tones", reflecting the diversity of the human race
>The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two. According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them "unlearn".
>People who are feeling defensive can say 'well there’s nothing wrong with white paper’, but in reality there could be if you don’t see yourself reflected in the things around you,” she said.
>“People might criticise this as political correctness gone mad. But it is because of political correctness we have moved on enormously. If you think that we now take it for granted that our buildings and public highways are adapted so people in wheelchairs and with pushchairs can move around. Years ago if you were in a wheelchair, then tough luck. We have completely moved and we wouldn’t have done that without the equality movement.”

The Equality movement... let that sink in. Equality is a dishonest term in that it is a codeword for anti-life, so far as the word 'life' has meaning in the survival sense. To make children equal, you must rob the entire youth of the challenges and experiences that make life bearable, so all kids can be the same as the drooling retard. Some people cannot be raised up from the bottom, because their constitution is simply inferior - the egalitarian insistence that all people are equal and their culture equally valid results in a failure to acknowledge this possibility and prevents any treatment of the cause. If you really wanted to raise the standards of children from 'disadvantaged communities' you would address the core social issue which would be to take them out of these communities and re socialise them while they are young, - you also get rid of all the negative cultural influences that affect them; the television, their music, anything that carries their culture, you get rid of it and instill in them the superior values of the majority group. Because that is not an option and therefore raising the standards of these people is impossible - the solution will more often than not to destroy the standards of education to a mind numbing dross, and the HAVE to do this, it is legislated and teachers on the front line have to meet their equality targets. They will also face the similar problem of addressing the equality issues of an imagined group such as aforementioned transsexual children. I mean, what the actual fuck are you supposed to do with that? A significant part of promoting equality is 'educating' young in cultural marxism at the expense of endless time that could have been spent educating children about practical life skills.

Looking back on my own experience it was difficult even then to get anything done - I really made the effort to try and challenge myself with something that resembled a protestant ethic, even for the things that didn't count; behaving well, dressing and speaking properly, but absolutely nobody gave a shit, and I feel my attitude actually resulted in me being penalised by some of the trotskyite teachers who made assumptions about my background. All the wealth and class issues leftists bang on about has nothing to do with it, We didn't have any money, any text books, television, computers, none of that - but we still tried - but what is the point of trying today? liberals don't know what they are doing, they hope they are going to create a generations of left wing hedonists , they are totally wrong it is economically and socially unsustainable. From primary education to university it is prizes for all, half the adult population doing temporised debased degrees that are worthless in the real world, - their hope is by this point you are so indoctrinated into the systems way of thinking that you don't realise you have been conned out of an existence. That is what all the liberal self celebration is for, it is the great social lie that is marching us to social oblivion - and therefore the promise of starting again.

The more the system does this the more that people will realise they face a very real choice between Integralism=Life and communism=death. Already this hopelessly flawed system is robbing the population of its idealism. it has already left a generation of young people with a bitter superiority complex - those who were intelligent and knew they could have done well, but realise now that their future and history has been sold out after they were mislead by false heroes and role models to maintain the wrong aspirations. You have the great social problem of enforced nihilism - to make people equal has meant that we have lost our national culture - the very thing that used to make like bearable, that got people up in the morning; anything that gave people pride and a sense of responsibility has been robbed from millions of our people, leaving a very big hole - right went hey all need it the most in face of the lofty and unattainable standards promoted by liberalism. Desperate, Betrayed, weakened, fearful - It invites trouble for the future from those offering a cure to the current mess.

Tuesday, 27 September 2011

Yuri Bezmenov - how to subvert a society



KGB defector who changed his name to Tomas Schuman on how to demoralise a society. His work has been widely stolen from by far right commentators, (programmes like follow the white rabbit) and this is the origin of the termiology. As an adversary the extent of his work was not to introduce into america something alien but to promote existing tendencies and attitudes in society that are already destroying it. There is apparantly reason behind it; it is questionable why american security interests (Security being the only section that functions properly) invest so much in countering internet censorship in china and 'democracy movements' in the middle east.

The point is you have a direct correlation between the dominant political attitudes in the west - and exactly what someone would do if they wanted to actually destroy a nation.

Yuri says their goal is to undermine/break up the following.

Ideas:
Religion - politicise, commercialise - postmodernism: 'supermarket of faith'
Education - promote moral relativity and permissiveness
Media - monopolise it, make it irrelevant and narrative driven, create a myopia of uninformed opinion
Culture - False heroes and role models, consumerism, fads.

Structures:
Law and order - Is 'legislative' not moral
Social relations - Rights vs. obligations, replacement of community with bureaucracy, social workers ect.
Security - denigrate the image of Police, Military, intelligence as dangerous. glamorise/portray sympathetically; outlaws, criminals, the enemy, spies, etc.
Internal politics - politics/Political party non issues = antagonisms - divide society against itself.
Foreign relations - enemies as 'friends', stunts, world community.

Life:
Family - Break up, create dependency on welfare.
Health - sports as supplement, junk food, - enfeeble the masses
Race - Run ethnic conflict, promote entitlement of minority group/oppression complex
Population - Urbanise the population, 'urban culture' to alienate them from the historical national life
Labour - Unions vs society. Promote entitlement and victimisation

I think an important part of argument is having a consistant message. Here you have all of these individual things that relate to the wider issue of national survival. To oppose the processes that are aimed against you requires that you should expose the destructive tendency for what it is. Liberals will say things like 'racist' if they want to discredit you, because if you promote group identity exclusion is a possibility = RACISM! - you must make people understand it is the same of liberalism, that it is their destruction and that the choice in this world is between Communism and Fascism/ death and Life.